These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 632417)

  • 21. Effects of channel-to-electrode mappings on speech reception with the ineraid cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 8654900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vibrotactile perception of segmental features of speech: a comparison of single-channel and multichannel instruments.
    Carney AE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 3172761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of two multichannel tactile aids for the hearing impaired.
    Weisenberger JM; Broadstone SM; Saunders FA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1764-75. PubMed ID: 2808925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prosodic and segmental aspects of speech perception with the House/3M single-channel implant.
    Rosen S; Walliker J; Brimacombe JA; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 2704206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The sentiphone: a tactual speech communication aid.
    Traunmüller H
    J Commun Disord; 1980 May; 13(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 6445912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cued Speech and the reception of spoken language.
    Nicholls GH; Ling D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 7120965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: a comparison with a single-channel tactile device.
    Carney AE; Kienle M; Miyamoto RT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2141660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of two training strategies for speech recognition with an electrotactile speech processor.
    Alcantara JI; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2138238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Articulation accuracy of children using an electrotactile speech processor.
    Galvin KL; Cowan RS; Sarant JZ; Tobey EA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 7789672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of two multichannel tactile devices as supplements to speechreading in a postlingually deafened adult.
    Waldstein RS; Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 7789671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes.
    van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():111-23. PubMed ID: 8153557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition.
    Duchnowski P; Lum DS; Krause JC; Sexton MG; Bratakos MS; Braida LD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Apr; 47(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 10763294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of tactile supplements in lipreading Swedish and English: a single-subject study.
    Plant G; Gnosspelius J; Levitt H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):172-83. PubMed ID: 10668660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speechreading enhancement: a comparison of spatial-tactile display of voice fundamental frequency (F0) with auditory F0.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Boothroyd A; Hanin L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):593-602. PubMed ID: 8675850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of an improved single-channel tactile aid to lipreading.
    Summers IR; Cooper PG; Brown BH; Stevens JC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():463-5. PubMed ID: 7668754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as an aid to the perception of speech pattern contrasts.
    Hnath-Chisolm T; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 1988 Dec; 9(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 3220185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychoacoustic aspects of speech pattern coding for the deaf.
    Faulkner A; Fourcin AJ; Moore BC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():172-80. PubMed ID: 2356724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.