These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6331721)
21. Intramammary scar tissue: a mimic of the mammographic appearance of carcinoma. Sickles EA; Herzog KA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Aug; 135(2):349-52. PubMed ID: 6773341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mammographic features of 455 invasive lobular carcinomas. Le Gal M; Ollivier L; Asselain B; Meunier M; Laurent M; Vielh P; Neuenschwander S Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):705-8. PubMed ID: 1438749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection. Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison between the mammographic extent of microcalcifications and the virtual extent of breast carcinoma, and observation of changes in mammographic features with time]. Matsunaga T; Satou Y; Fujii M; Kusama M; Koyanagi Y; Kimura K Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Aug; 54(9):827-34. PubMed ID: 7936980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The diagnostic value of mammographic signs of malignancy in clinically occult breast carcinoma (author's transl)]. Menges V; Büsing CM; Hirsch O Rofo; 1981 Oct; 135(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 6212369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic features. Pope TL; Fechner RE; Wilhelm MC; Wanebo HJ; de Paredes ES Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 3380984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancer: serial radiologic-pathologic correlation in 27 cases. Stomper PC; Davis SP; Weidner N; Meyer JE Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 2847231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The mammographic images of the irradiated breast after conservative therapy for carcinoma]. Carlotti GA; Siragusa A; Grillo Ruggieri F; Vitali ML; Grimaldi A; Barone D Radiol Med; 1993; 86(1-2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8346340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old. Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Role of ultrasonics in the diagnosis of subclinical carcinoma of the breast]. Giuseppetti GM; Rizzatto G; Gozzi G; Ercolani P Radiol Med; 1989 Oct; 78(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 2687963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recent trends in the management of breast cancer. 2. Occult breast lesions: when and how to perform a biopsy for mammographic abnormalities. Robidoux A Can J Surg; 1992 Aug; 35(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 1498736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. Ikeda DM; Andersson I; Wattsgård C; Janzon L; Linell F AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 1632342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The subtle and atypical mammographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma. Sickles EA Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 1984313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Regression of breast cancer in four patients treated with tamoxifen: mammographic features. Taylor C; Georgian-Smith D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 8109507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Relation between mammographic findings and hormonal receptor content in breast cancer. Nielsen NS; Poulsen HS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Sep; 145(3):501-4. PubMed ID: 2992254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammographic changes following biopsy and lumpectomy-breast irradiation. Wapnir IL; Alden-Corbett S; Zicherman B; Greco RS N J Med; 1993 Jan; 90(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 8380491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic importance of the radiographic density of noncalcified breast masses: analysis of 91 lesions. Jackson VP; Dines KA; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Reynolds HE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1646563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast. Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Small (< 2.0-cm) breast cancers: mammographic and US findings at US-guided cryoablation--initial experience. Roubidoux MA; Sabel MS; Bailey JE; Kleer CG; Klein KA; Helvie MA Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):857-67. PubMed ID: 15567802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]