These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6331721)

  • 41. [Two mammographic periods compared].
    Giuseppetti GM; Baldassarre S; Ercolani P; Segoni A; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1990 Dec; 80(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 2281164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
    Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mammographic spectrum of traumatic fat necrosis: the fallibility of "pathognomonic" signs of carcinoma.
    Bassett LW; Gold RH; Cove HC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 413396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography.
    Hall FM; Storella JM; Silverstone DZ; Wyshak G
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 3282256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The technique and results of mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
    Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
    Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stability of a mammographic mass: a false sense of security.
    Meyer JE; Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):595-8. PubMed ID: 6974476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Mammographic appearance and pathological correlation.
    Feig SA; Shaber GS; Patchefsky AS; Schwartz GF; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 212776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Diagnostic value of calcifications in mammography].
    Tetti C; Delaude C
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1990; 85(7-9):461-6. PubMed ID: 2237155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The art of mammographic positioning.
    Eklund GW; Cardenosa G
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):21-53. PubMed ID: 1732927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Growth velocity of breast carcinoma and radiographic "early diagnoses"].
    Fournier DV; Kuttig H; Kubli F; Prager P; Stolpe H; Maier A; Hüter J
    Strahlentherapie; 1976 Apr; 151(4):318-32. PubMed ID: 1265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Roentgen symptoms of early cancer of the breast].
    Kopp W; Fotter R; Schneider G
    Radiologe; 1986 Oct; 26(10):498-502. PubMed ID: 3024205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An analysis of the results of mammographically guided biopsies of the breast.
    McCreery BR; Frankl G; Frost DB
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 172(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 1847244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mammographic features of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a comparative analysis.
    Cornford EJ; Wilson AR; Athanassiou E; Galea M; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Blamey RW
    Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):450-3. PubMed ID: 7788227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mammographic tumour appearance and triple-negative breast cancer associated with long-term prognosis of breast cancer death: a Swedish Cohort Study.
    Tsau HS; Yen AM; Fann JC; Wu WY; Yu CP; Chen SL; Chiu SY; Tabár L; Kuo WH; Chen HH; Chang KJ
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 39(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25731718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radiological guidelines for the detection of early breast cancer: a review.
    Van den Bosch H; Seynaeve P; Kockx MM; Storms JL
    J Belge Radiol; 1990 Oct; 73(5):339-56. PubMed ID: 2273042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Histological Patterns and Mammographic Presentation of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Show No Obvious Associations.
    Cserni G; Bori R; Ambrózay É; Serfőző O
    Cancers (Basel); 2024 Apr; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 38730592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The mammographic density of breast cancer.
    Cory RC; Linden SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Feb; 160(2):418-9. PubMed ID: 8424368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Re-pitching the tent sign: A case report.
    Estrin Y; Drotman M
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Apr; 72():194-197. PubMed ID: 33385716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating the success of mammography at the local level: how to conduct an audit of your practice.
    Spring DB; Kimbrell-Wilmot K
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):983-92. PubMed ID: 3628755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.