BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6333795)

  • 1. Assessment of primary gynecologic malignancies: comparison of 0.15-T resistive MRI with CT.
    Bies JR; Ellis JH; Kopecky KK; Sutton GP; Klatte EC; Stehman FB; Ehrlich CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1249-57. PubMed ID: 6333795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Value of MRI, CT and findings in staging of gynecologic malignancies].
    Lorenzen M; Braun J; Gehrckens A; Nicolas V
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):266-72. PubMed ID: 9894525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging of the abnormal female pelvis.
    Butler H; Bryan PJ; LiPuma JP; Cohen AM; El Yousef S; Andriole JG; Lieberman J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1259-66. PubMed ID: 6388282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Bakir B; Iyibozkurt C; Ozel S; Has D; Yilmaz E; Topuz S; Yavuz E; Unal SN; Mudun A
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 May; 33(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 22357440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
    Suzuki M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Gynecologic tumor].
    Kimura I; Togashi K; Konishi J; Taii S; Takai I; Mori T; Tamai T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1990 Nov; 17(11):2172-81. PubMed ID: 2241181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI of the female pelvis: a review.
    Hricak H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1115-22. PubMed ID: 3486556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Bone and liver metastases in uterine, cervical and ovarian cancer].
    Karkavitsas N
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Aug; 41(8):326-8. PubMed ID: 3217713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staging of gynecologic malignancies.
    Ascher SM; Takahama J; Jha RC
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Apr; 12(2):105-29. PubMed ID: 11296804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of MR imaging after the initial radiation therapy].
    Monzen Y; Mori H; Matsumoto A; Yoshida S; Wakisaka M; Komatsu E; Tashiro M; Hori Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):745-50. PubMed ID: 8532506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Problem of pretherapeutic staging of cervical carcinoma. Studies of the diagnostic value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with gynecologic palpation findings and pathologic-anatomic diagnosis].
    Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Schweden F; Klose K; Lochner B; Beck T; Friese K; Kreienberg R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):838-42. PubMed ID: 3436507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [MRT diagnosis of recurrence of gynecologic tumors].
    Lorenzen M; Nicolas V; Kopp A
    Rofo; 1994 Dec; 161(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 7803776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiological assessment of gynecologic malignancies.
    Bell DJ; Pannu HK
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):45-68, vii. PubMed ID: 21419327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
    Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
    Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic and interventional radiology in gynecologic neoplasms.
    Thorvinger B
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1992; 378 ( Pt 3)():93-108. PubMed ID: 1323200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of gynecologic cancer with MR imaging, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging.
    Lee SI; Catalano OA; Dehdashti F
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 25635136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma -- review].
    Hauth EA; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16673246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recurrent female pelvic cancer: assessment with transrectal ultrasonography.
    Meanwell CA; Rolfe EB; Blackledge G; Docker MF; Lawton FG; Mould JJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):278-81. PubMed ID: 3538149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The diagnosis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of ovarian carcinoma].
    Mizuno K
    Rinsho Byori; 1992 Feb; 40(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 1583787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.