These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The family, the courts, and mental health professionals. Hennessey EF Am Psychol; 1989 Sep; 44(9):1223-4. PubMed ID: 2782729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Parental kidnapping. Legal history, profiles of risk, and preventive interventions. Johnston JR; Sagatun-Edwards I Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2002 Oct; 11(4):805-22, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 12397900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indian Family Exception Doctrine: still losing children despite the Indian Child Welfare Act. Cross SL Child Welfare; 2006; 85(4):671-90. PubMed ID: 17039824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Aspects of family-oriented diagnosis in compulsory legal family expert assessment]. Mladek G; Löffler M; Nickel P Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1990 Jun; 42(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 2402543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Child custody and child psychiatry. Herman SP J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1988 Mar; 27(2):260. PubMed ID: 3360737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AACAP Official Action. Summary of the practice parameters for child custody evaluation. Herman SP; Bernet W J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1997 Dec; 36(12):1784-7. PubMed ID: 9401340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Aspects of the legal concession and its procedures concerning the commitment of juveniles to safe custody institutions in youth welfare care according to German (section sign) 1631 b BGB -- an Inquiry into 101 cases of adolescent psychiatric expertise]. Rüth U; Wentzel A; Freisleder FJ Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Nov; 66(11):739-47. PubMed ID: 15562344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the best interests of the child--a model of multidisciplinary teamwork. Pardess E; Finzi R; Sever J Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):205-11. PubMed ID: 8231685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Policy and practice for response to foster families when child abuse or neglect is reported. Carbino R Child Welfare; 1992; 71(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 1424945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The parental paradox. van Nijnatten C Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):15-23. PubMed ID: 8377608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Legal family assessment in the case of alcoholic parents]. Siefen RG; Boerger G; Klar W Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1996 Nov; 45(9):343-9. PubMed ID: 9036387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual abuse allegations in child custody disputes. Elterman MF; Ehrenberg MF Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 1864693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Child custody disputes within the context of child protection investigations: secondary analysis of the Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect. Saini MA; Black T; Fallon B; Marshall A Child Welfare; 2013; 92(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 23984488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Shaken baby syndrome: the description and later?]. Azéma B Arch Pediatr; 2010 Jun; 17(6):978-9. PubMed ID: 20654989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does peer review have a place in child custody evaluations? Herman SP; Levy AM Child Today; 1989; 18(3):15-8. PubMed ID: 2752843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Using attachment measures in the context of providing expert witness through psychiatric assessment in family court proceedings]. Besier T; Ziegenhain U; Fegert JM; Künster AK Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2012; 61(4):255-70. PubMed ID: 22957398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]