These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6337766)

  • 1. The new low-osmolar contrast media: a simple guide.
    Dawson P; Grainger RG; Pitfield J
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Mar; 34(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 6337766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography.
    Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New contrast agents. Chemistry and pharmacology.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S293-300. PubMed ID: 6511274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate].
    Tajima H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haemodynamic side effects of meglumine ioglicate, meglumine sodium ioxaglate and iohexol in aortofemoral angiography: comparison of a high-osmolar and two low-osmolar radiological contrast media.
    Wiebe V; Straub H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():78-84. PubMed ID: 6139084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Iohexol and iopamidol: second-generation nonionic radiographic contrast media.
    Kawada TK
    Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1985; 19(7-8):525-9. PubMed ID: 3896713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative study of 2 contrast media with low osmolarity in pediatric angiocardiography].
    Hoeffel JC; Donze B; Worms AM; Lostette Y
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):712-3. PubMed ID: 6367613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iopromide. A new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Dawson P; Bradshaw A; Hill C
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 6475563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Boylan L
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 7141831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical trials in adults.
    Mathias K; Seemann W
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):44-6. PubMed ID: 3523640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of low osmolality water soluble (LOWS) contrast media in the pediatric gastro-intestinal tract. A report of 115 examinations.
    Ratcliffe JF
    Pediatr Radiol; 1986; 16(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3945499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media].
    Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proteinuria following nephroangiography. VII. Comparison between ionic monomeric, monoacidic dimeric and non-ionic contrast media in the dog.
    Törnquist C; Almén T; Golman K; Holtås S
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():49-52. PubMed ID: 6267893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Non-ionic contrast media].
    Wójtowicz JS
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1985 Dec 23-30; 40(51-52):1476-8. PubMed ID: 3913946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formulation and clinical introduction of low osmolality contrast media.
    Grainger RG
    Radiologe; 1981 Jun; 21(6):261-7. PubMed ID: 7268025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of five different contrast agents on serum complement and calcium levels after excretory urography.
    Freyria AM; Pinet A; Belleville J; Eloy R; Traeger J
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1982 Apr; 69(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 7069076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.
    Dawson P; Hewitt P; Mackie IJ; Machin SJ; Amin S; Bradshaw A
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 3957598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excretion of urographic contrast media. I. Iohexol and other media during free urine flow in the rabbit.
    Sjöberg S; Almén T; Golman K
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():93-8. PubMed ID: 6267900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of high- and low-osmolar contrast media on renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate in euvolaemic and dehydrated rats. A comparison between ioxithalamate, iopamidol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
    Nygren A; Ulfendahl HR
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 2775601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.