These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6338058)

  • 1. Automated reading of a microtitre plate: preliminary evaluation in antimicrobial susceptibility tests and Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Courcol RJ; Deleersnyder H; Roussel-Delvallez M; Martin GR
    J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar; 36(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 6338058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the Replireader in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urine and in the recording of sensitivity tests performed by an agar dilution method.
    Waterworth PM
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun; 33(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 6995495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of Vitek--an automated system for bacterial identification and susceptibility testing.
    Downes A; Thornhill C; Mallard RH
    Commun Dis Public Health; 1998 Sep; 1(3):206-7. PubMed ID: 9782638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Information on the automated COBAS-Bact system].
    Antal M; Seckárová A; Krcméry V; Králíková K
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1986 Sep; 35(5):316-9. PubMed ID: 2944635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Identification of gram-negative aerobic and non-fastidious aero-anaerobic bacilli using the ATB 32 GN system].
    Croize J; Rouhan D; Le Noc P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3555180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel Direct MIC-gradient Strip Method to screen for antibiotic-resistant faecal Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gammelsrud KW; Knudsen PK; Høiby EA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():94-97. PubMed ID: 27526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Influence of the mixed inoculum on the species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test results by the automated microbial systems].
    Higa M; Kisanuki K; Yamane N; Nakasone I
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Apr; 56(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 18516962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Automatic reading of microtitration plates: identification of Enterobacteriaceae and determination of their minimal inhibitory concentrations].
    Courcol R; Martin G
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1983; 41(5):331-5. PubMed ID: 6364897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automating a 96-well microtitre plate model for Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: an approach to screening of natural antimicrobial compounds.
    Sandberg M; Määttänen A; Peltonen J; Vuorela PM; Fallarero A
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 Sep; 32(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 18640013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid processing of urine specimens by urine screening and the AutoMicrobic system.
    Wadke M; McDonnell C; Ashton JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):668-72. PubMed ID: 6759524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of AMS and MS-2 in the identification and antibiotic sensitivity of clinically isolated bacterial strains].
    Chiaradia V; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):176-91. PubMed ID: 6374736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experience and problems with biochemical differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae with microtiter plates].
    Schartmann B; Herrmann DK; Kiesewalter J; Presber W
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 Nov; 36(11):615-7. PubMed ID: 2085046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated system for analytical microbiology. II. Construction of system and evaluation of antibiotics and vitamins.
    Kuzel NR; Kavanagh FW
    J Pharm Sci; 1971 May; 60(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 4942267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Dynatech MR 580 microplate reader for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Mazens MF; Bartlett RC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Feb; 19(2):300. PubMed ID: 6699155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    McCracken AW; Martin WJ; McCarthy LR; Schwab DA; Cooper BH; Helgeson NG; Prowant S; Robson J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 7024299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Automation of antibiograms. Effect on the response delay of bacteriologic tests].
    Carret G; Flandrois JP
    Nouv Presse Med; 1982 Nov; 11(44):3247-50. PubMed ID: 7155826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests by the fully automated RAISUS using an early-harvested cell suspension].
    Nakasone I; Kisanuki K; Higa M; Kinjo T; Yamane N
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 2006; 17(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 17822333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the OSIRIS video reader as an automated measurement system for the agar disk diffusion technique.
    Kolbert M; Chegrani F; Shah PM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 May; 10(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 15113318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary evaluation of the autoSCAN-3, an instrument for automated reading an interpretation of microdilution trays: identification of aerobic gram-negative bacilli.
    Ellner PD; Myers DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Sep; 14(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 7026602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods.
    Rantakokko-Jalava K; Elo-Lehtonen E; Meurman O
    APMIS; 2006 Jan; 114(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16499660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.