157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6338086)
1. Digital subtraction intravenous left ventricular angiography: comparison with conventional intraventricular angiography.
Goldberg HL; Borer JS; Moses JW; Fisher J; Cohen B; Skelly NT
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 1(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 6338086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the angiographic accuracy of digital left ventriculography.
Nichols AB; Martin EC; Fles TP; Stugensky KM; Balancio LA; Casarella WJ; Weiss MB
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 6849261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of left ventricular performance using digital subtraction angiography.
Kronenberg MW; Price RR; Smith CW; Robertson RM; Perry JM; Pickens DR; Domanski MJ; Partain CL; Friesinger GC
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 51(5):837-42. PubMed ID: 6338690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of digital intravenous ventriculography with direct left ventriculography for quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions.
Norris SL; Slutsky RA; Mancini J; Ashburn WL; Gregoratos G; Peterson KL; Higgins CB
Am J Cardiol; 1983 May; 51(8):1399-403. PubMed ID: 6846167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Volume and regional contraction of the left ventricle studied with venous injection in subtraction angiography].
Rasoamanambelo L; Doriot PA; Fleisch M; Chatelain P; Noble J; Bopp P; Rutishauser W
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1985 Mar; 34(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 3890677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital angiography: a new method for the study of the left ventricle].
Ghio S; Alerci M; Cornalba P; Rota L; De Servi S; Specchia G; Montemartini C; Di Guglielmo L
G Ital Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 16(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 3519346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital subtraction ventriculography in determining global and regional left ventricular parameters compared to left catheterization cardiography].
Eichstädt H; Langer M; Felix R
Radiologe; 1984 Jun; 24(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 6382430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with low-contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography.
Mancini GB; Hodgson JM; Legrand V; Bates ER; Aueron FM; LeFree MT; Smith JS; Beauman GJ; Vogel RA
Chest; 1985 May; 87(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 3886314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravenous left ventriculography utilizing digital subtraction technique.
Nonogi H; Sasayama S; Sakurai T; Kawai C; Fujita M; Eiho S; Kuwahara M
Jpn Circ J; 1984 Jun; 48(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 6376842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of left ventricular function and wall motion in man.
O'Connor MK; Quigley PJ; Gearty GF
Eur Heart J; 1984 Aug; 5(8):652-9. PubMed ID: 6207025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: accuracy of left ventricular volume determination using intravenous injection of contrast medium].
Lauber A; Fischbach T; Jehle J; Pölitz B; Schmiel FK; Spiller P; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):262-7. PubMed ID: 6349159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility, reliability, and advantage of utilizing low contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography in a conventional catheterization laboratory.
Denardo SJ; Anderson DJ; Gould RG; Lipton MJ; Brundage BH; Ports TA
Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 3898796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of 10-milliliter digital subtraction ventriculograms compared with standard cineangiograms.
Tobis JM; Nalcioglu O; Johnston WD; Seibert A; Roeck W; Iseri LT; Elkayam U; Henry WL
Am Heart J; 1983 Jun; 105(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 6344605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography.
Greenbaum RA; Evans TR
Br Heart J; 1984 Feb; 51(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 6362689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exercise left ventriculography utilizing intravenous digital angiography.
Goldberg HL; Moses JW; Borer JS; Fisher J; Tamari I; Skelly NT; Cohen B
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Dec; 2(6):1092-8. PubMed ID: 6355241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of digital and radionuclide left ventriculography in patients at risk from conventional left ventriculography.
Lemarbre L; Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Dupras G; Laurier J
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 6396304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of ventricular function analysis by digital subtraction angiography.
Takahashi M; Tsuchigame T; Tomiguchi S; Hayasaki K
Comput Radiol; 1984; 8(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 6397326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of left ventricular contractile pattern by intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography: comparison with cineangiography and assessment of interobserver variability.
Nissen SE; Booth D; Waters J; Fassas T; DeMaria AN
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Dec; 52(10):1293-8. PubMed ID: 6359852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
