198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6339751)
1. The Harvard fraud case: where does the problem lie?
Knox R
JAMA; 1983 Apr; 249(14):1797-99, 1802-7. PubMed ID: 6339751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coping with fraud: the Darsee Case.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1983 Apr; 220(4592):31-5. PubMed ID: 6828878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deeper problems for Darsee: Emory probe.
Knox RA
JAMA; 1983 Jun; 249(21):2867, 2871-3, 2876. PubMed ID: 6842794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH to review Emory in Darsee case.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1983 Jun; 220(4601):1029. PubMed ID: 11643994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On analyzing scientific fraud.
Braunwald E
Nature; 1987 Jan 15-21; 325(6101):215-6. PubMed ID: 3808020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Report absolves Harvard in case of fakery.
Broad WJ
Science; 1982 Feb; 215(4534):874-6. PubMed ID: 7058339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduce fraud in seven easy steps.
Norman C
Science; 1984 May; 224(4649):581. PubMed ID: 6710157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Harvard researcher draws heavy penalty for faking results.
Med World News; 1983 Mar; 24(5):48-50. PubMed ID: 11653447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Emory reports on Darsee's fraud.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1983 May; 220(4600):936. PubMed ID: 6844919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud inquiry spreads blame.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1983 Feb; 219(4587):937. PubMed ID: 11643955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deceit in research.
Lancet; 1983 May; 1(8335):1211. PubMed ID: 11644256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Harvard delays in reporting fraud.
Broad WJ
Science; 1982 Jan; 215(4532):478-82. PubMed ID: 11643697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data falsification: NIH decrees ten-year ban on research grants.
Budiansky S
Nature; 1983 Feb; 301(5902):645. PubMed ID: 11643965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Too good to be true.
Colt GH
Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dingell encounters feather wall.
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6221):161. PubMed ID: 2654646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A view of misconduct in science.
Racker E
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific fraud probed at AAAS meeting.
Smith RJ
Science; 1985 Jun; 228(4705):1292-3. PubMed ID: 3832437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Article brings censure recommendation.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1987 Sep; 258(9):1137. PubMed ID: 3306007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
Mishkin B
JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
