These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6340021)

  • 1. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Mar; 55(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions.
    Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Feb; 55(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 6340017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Jul; 11(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 6378985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions.
    Kullendorff B; Gröndahl K; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital subtraction radiography for the detection of periodontal bone changes].
    Mera T
    Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Mar; 31(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 2517790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of bone lesions by subtraction radiography.
    Rethman M; Ruttiman U; O'Neal R; Webber R; Davis A; Greenstein G; Woodyard S
    J Periodontol; 1985 Jun; 56(6):324-9. PubMed ID: 3891960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of subtraction radiography in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Hausmann E; Christersson L; Dunford R; Wikesjo U; Phyo J; Genco RJ
    J Periodontol; 1985 Nov; 56(11 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3908638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Digital subtraction radiography technique in oral diagnosis].
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Braegger U; Lang NP
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Oct; 43(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 2518067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examiner agreement in estimating changes in periodontal bone from conventional and subtraction radiographs.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Wennström J; Heijl L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 14(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 3546401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detectability of artificial marginal bone lesions as a function of lesion depth. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique.
    Gröndahl K; Kullendorff B; Strid KG; Gröndahl HG; Henrikson CO
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 3280612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Detection of small alveolar bone lesions by digital subtraction radiography].
    Zhou S; Ma X; Zhang G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 33(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 11774691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of three-walled infrabony defects by subtraction radiography.
    Putnins E; Lavelle CL; Holthuis A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jan; 65(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 3277105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital subtraction of radiograph in evaluating alveolar bone changes after initial periodontal therapy.
    Okano T; Mera T; Ohki M; Ishikawa I; Yamada N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Feb; 69(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 2406677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of simulated periodontal bone gain by digital subtraction radiography with tuned-aperture computed tomography. The effect of angular disparity.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11313728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images.
    Brägger U; Pasquali L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 2654196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice.
    Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 71(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 10776940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.