These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Is it necessary to polish amalgam restorations]. Boer JG der Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1972 Nov; 79(11):406-8. PubMed ID: 4515679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Techniques for finishing and polishing amalgam restorations. Woerth JK Dent Hyg (Chic); 1981 Sep; 55(9):31-5. PubMed ID: 6948705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of techniques for the evaluation of marginal adaptation of amalgam restorations. Mjör IA; Ryge G Int Dent J; 1981 Mar; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7009431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adhesive restorations with amalgam: guidelines for the clinician. Gwinnett AJ; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1994 Oct; 25(10):687-95. PubMed ID: 9161246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A radiographic method of estimating surface area of amalgam restorations. Sammut E; Deery C; Nugent Z; Ibbetson R J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):811-6. PubMed ID: 16687199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality control in amalgam restorations. I. A standardized method for the evaluation of class I and class II restorations]. van Amerongen WE Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1982 May; 89(5):205-9. PubMed ID: 6955624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental marginal leakage around high copper dental amalgam restorations. Sparrius O; Jodaikin A Diastema; 1981; 9():11-4. PubMed ID: 6762977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Hardness tests of dental amalgam restorations]. Schultz BA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1973 May; 80(5):167-74. PubMed ID: 4513724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Corrosion potential variation of aged dental amalgam restorations over time. Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Hall GC Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 16084580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of acid-etch procedures on silver amalgam restorations. Leach CD; Martinoff JT Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1983; 3(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 6343276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Mjör IA Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]