These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6340797)
41. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access. Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparative study of periodontal disease in relation to approximating tooth surface to filled surface of Class II silver amalgam restorations. Srivastava RP Uttar Pradesh State Dent J; 1980 Jan; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6934639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Functional modeling of the occlusal surfaces in amalgam reconstructions (Class I and II)]. Palazzo U Stomatol Mediterr; 1984; 4(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 6599196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [The marginal leakage of amalgam and Vitrebond restorations after an occlusal load test]. Toschi E; Ruggeri O; Semprini P; Montanari MC; Prati C Minerva Stomatol; 1993; 42(11-12):487-90. PubMed ID: 8164623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Amalgam restorations under the microscope. Toffenetti F Dent Update; 1993 Oct; 20(8):336-40. PubMed ID: 8056106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Amalgam. XI. Glass-ionomer as a possible substitute of amalgam: longevity]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Jan; 101(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11830988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Amalgam surface structure before, during and after polishing]. Nyström P Tandlakartidningen; 1981 May; 73(10):534-43. PubMed ID: 6947486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations. Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations. Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]