These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 634186)

  • 1. Cardiac damage produced by transchest damped sine wave shocks.
    Tacker WA; Davis JS; Lie JT; Titus JL; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 634186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of shock strength on survival and acute cardiac damage induced by open-thorax defibrillation of dogs.
    Van Vleet JF; Tacker WA; Cechner PE; Bright RM; Greene JA; Raffee MR; Geddes LA; Ferrans VJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1978 Jun; 39(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 666096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrocardiographic and serum enzymic alterations associated with cardiac alterations induced in dogs by single transthoracic damped sinusoidal defibrillator shocks of various strengths.
    Tacker WA; Van Vleet JF; Geddes LA
    Am Heart J; 1979 Aug; 98(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 453021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of myocardial damage from defibrillator discharges at various dosages.
    Ewy GA; Taren D; Bangert J; McClung S; Hellman DA
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 7354738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Damage in canine hearts following defibrillator shocks.
    Lumb G; Anderson GJ; Kase ML; Woo DV
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1986; 16(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 3013075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of apparently nontoxic doses of digoxin on ventricular ectopy after direct-current electrical shocks in dogs.
    Ditchey RV; Curtis GP
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Jul; 218(1):212-6. PubMed ID: 7241379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute cardiac damage in dogs given multiple transthoracic shocks with a trapezoidal wave-form defibrillator.
    Van Vleet JF; Tacker WA; Geddes LA; Ferrans VJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1977 May; 38(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 879560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The electrical dose for direct ventricular defibrillation in man.
    Tacker WA; Guinn GA; Geddes LA; Bourland JD; Korompai FL; Rubio PA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Feb; 75(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 625127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The induction of myocardial damage by open-chest low-energy countershock.
    Knox MA; Hughes HC; Tyers GF; Seidl D; Demers LM
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 7354735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.
    Hinds M; Ayers GM; Bourland JD; Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Fearnot N
    Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3614037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing of defibrillation shocks for resuscitation of rapid ventricular tachycardia: does it make a difference?
    Turner I; Turner S; Grace AA
    Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19091453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct activation of cardiac adrenergic nerve endings by defibrillator shocks.
    Niebauer MJ; Geddes LA; Babbs CF
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(3):162-3. PubMed ID: 3724591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic indices for transchest defibrillator shocks: effective, damaging, and lethal electrical doses.
    Babbs CF; Tacker WA; VanVleet JF; Bourland JD; Geddes LA
    Am Heart J; 1980 Jun; 99(6):734-8. PubMed ID: 7377095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphologic study of cardiac cells in sheep before and after electric shock].
    Fontaliran F; Fillette F; Nassif G; Lascault G; Aouate P; Grosgogeat Y
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1988 Mar; 81(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 3134873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
    Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
    Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Myocardial damage after repetitive direct current shock in the dog: correlation between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and extent of myocardial necrosis.
    Mehta J; Runge W; Cohn JN; Carlyle P
    J Lab Clin Med; 1978 Feb; 91(2):272-89. PubMed ID: 621428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do intramural virtual electrodes facilitate successful defibrillation? Model-based analysis of experimental evidence.
    Hooks DA; Trew ML; Smaill BH; Pullan AJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 16643406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional cardiac depression caused by defibrillator shocks. Quantitation of the safety factor for electrical defibrillation.
    Niebauer MJ; Babbs CF; Geddes LA; Carter JE; Bourland JD
    Jpn Heart J; 1984 Sep; 25(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 6512993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-energy electrical current and myocardial damage.
    Resnekov L
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 634185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.