These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 634231)

  • 1. Single-step calculation of the MTF from the ERF.
    Schneiders NJ; Bushong SC
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 634231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detector.
    Hunter DM; Belev G; Kasap S; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):608-22. PubMed ID: 22320770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner.
    Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1976; 3(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 785200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to measure the MTF of digital x-ray systems.
    Sones RA; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 6727791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of modulation transfer function shape on computed tomographic image quality.
    Joseph PM; Stockham CD
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 7122876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer function measurement and analysis for a magnetic resonance imager.
    Mohapatra SM; Turley JD; Prince JR; Blechinger JC; Wilson DA
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1141-4. PubMed ID: 1753895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of 29 EMI CT machines in Britain.
    Speller RD; White DR; Veerappan R; Coleman AJ; Waller PE
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):232-40. PubMed ID: 7470785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 87.
    Pahn G; Skornitzke S; Schlemmer HP; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 26520485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analytical edge spread function model for computer fitting and subsequent calculation of the LSF and MTF.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1541-5. PubMed ID: 7869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of finite exposure slits in determination of the line spread function and modulation transfer function.
    Villafana T
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1977 Jun; 16(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 906897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Accuracy of Modulation Transfer Function for Target Size and Field of View in a Circular Edge Strategy Using the CT Image Measurement Program].
    Fukunaga M; Onishi H; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun; 72(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 27320152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer assisted MTF determination in CT.
    Schneiders NJ; Bushong SC
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 7366547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finite-element differentiation.
    Cunningham IA; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 3626992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of aliasing in modulation transfer function measurements.
    Ehrhardt JC
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):658-62. PubMed ID: 3784992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.
    Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2001 Mar; 28(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 11318317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques.
    Cunningham IA; Reid BK
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.