These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 634242)

  • 1. Image information content and patient exposure.
    Motz JW; Danos M
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(1):8-22. PubMed ID: 634242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New method for the experimental evaluation of x-ray grids.
    Dick CE; Motz JW
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 683152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality and the clinical radiographic examination.
    Vyborny CJ
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(2):479-98. PubMed ID: 9084085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed radiography.
    Kantor C
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 9051233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.
    Parry RA; Glaze SA; Archer BR
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(5):1289-302. PubMed ID: 10489180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative image quality of 105 mm and conventional spot films.
    Weaver KE; Trembley CA; Lewicki AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 6607654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical note. Evaluation of a new screen/film combination.
    Evans AL; Davison M; McLellan J; James WB
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Oct; 48(574):858-9. PubMed ID: 1191907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1068-77. PubMed ID: 11271899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.
    Johns PC; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 4010633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Harmonization of x-ray photography].
    Suzuki S; Tanaka M; Dokiya T; Nagase T; Yoshioka T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1971 Mar; 16(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 5205290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
    Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting x-ray spectra.
    Nickoloff EL; Berman HL
    Radiographics; 1993 Nov; 13(6):1337-48. PubMed ID: 8290728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography.
    Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-slit digital radiography: some practical considerations.
    Tesic MM; Sones RA; Morgan DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Apr; 142(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 6367399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.