These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6343276)

  • 21. [Bonding and silver amalgam. A new clinical approach].
    Roth F; Colon P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1987 Jun; 41(158):261-76. PubMed ID: 3328477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal leakage of compacted gold, composite resin, and high-copper amalgam restorations.
    Hormati AA; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Oct; 44(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 6997471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Class II coronal restorations: silver amalgam or composites? Materials of choice].
    Baldensperger R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 1070068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomical form defines color: function, form, and aesthetics.
    Terry DA; Geller W; Tric O; Anderson MJ; Tourville M; Kobashigawa A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):59-67; quiz 68. PubMed ID: 11905160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of periodontal disease in relation to approximating tooth surface to filled surface of Class II silver amalgam restorations.
    Srivastava RP
    Uttar Pradesh State Dent J; 1980 Jan; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6934639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Management of the prepared tooth for placement of direct posterior composite restorations.
    O'Keefe KL; Pinzon LM
    Dent Today; 2005 Sep; 24(9):70, 72, 74-7; quiz 77. PubMed ID: 16229294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Kinetic cavity preparation effects on secondary caries formation around resin restorations: a polarized light microscopic in vitro evaluation.
    Hicks MJ; Parkins FM; Flaitz CM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(2):115-21, 80, 142. PubMed ID: 11475686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical aspects of enamel bonding.
    Galan D; Lynch E
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1993; 39(5):128-37. PubMed ID: 8035064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; GarcĂ­a-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Acid-etching technic with conventionally prepared cavities].
    Petschelt A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Feb; 37(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 7042306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of etchant and bonding agent on the inhibition of secondary caries in composite resin restorations.
    Tanizaki K; Mochizuki A; Kobayashi S; Fukuda K; Staninec M; Inoue K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1981 Dec; 21():145-52. PubMed ID: 7047700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Amalgam obturation of a class V cavity in a molar tooth. 2 key points: retention and shaping].
    Pescarmona G
    Attual Dent; 1985 Nov; 1(27):6-11. PubMed ID: 3914893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bonding failures in composite resin restorations.
    Gwinnett AJ
    J Mass Dent Soc; 1983; 32(2):63, 65, 67 passim. PubMed ID: 6350520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.