These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6344031)

  • 1. Effects of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements on stainless steel crown retention.
    Noffsinger DP; Jedrychowski JR; Caputo AA
    Pediatr Dent; 1983 Mar; 5(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 6344031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.
    Raghunath Reddy MH; Subba Reddy VV; Basappa N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21273711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
    Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of glass cementation on stainless steel crown retention.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Bugg JL
    J Pedod; 1987; 11(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 3327935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of three luting agents used with stainless steel crowns.
    Berg JH; Pettey DE; Hutchins MO
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Sep; 10(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 3077447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forces fracturing cements at die interfaces and their dependence on film thickness.
    Iizuka H; Brauer GM; Rupp N; Ohashi M; Paffenbarger G
    Dent Mater; 1987 Aug; 3(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 3326772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of cement type and tooth preparation on the retention of stainless steel crowns.
    Myers DR; Bell RA; Barenie JT
    J Pedod; 1981; 5(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 7038084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Shiflett K; White SN
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9200198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of cast posts relative to cement selection.
    Young HM; Shen C; Maryniuk GA
    Quintessence Int; 1985 May; 16(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 3898190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of stainless steel crowns luted with a glass ionomer cement.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Landry JK
    J Pedod; 1989; 13(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 2700484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Retention of three different luting cements (author's transl)].
    Goto T; Adachi M; Otani Y
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1981 Apr; 22(59):168-71. PubMed ID: 7033413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on adhesive materials for restoration. (8) Effect of powder-liquid ratio and working time on the gap between crown and working model when using glass ionomer cement (author's transl)].
    Irie M; Nakajima H; Onozawa Y; Kawamura K; Nakai H; Hashimoto H
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1979; 8(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 297478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns.
    Piemjai M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 12066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.
    Browning WD; Nelson SK; Cibirka R; Myers ML
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11890033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retentive properties of luting cements: an in vitro investigation.
    Dahl BL; Oilo G
    Dent Mater; 1986 Feb; 2(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 3519330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.