These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6345578)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Buesching WJ; Svirbely JR; Ayers LW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 May; 17(5):824-9. PubMed ID: 6345578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of media in the Anaerobe-Tek and Presumpto plate systems and evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of commonly encountered anaerobes.
    Lombard GL; Whaley DN; Dowell VR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 16(6):1066-72. PubMed ID: 6761359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Keifer JC; Venbrux HJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the oxyrase OxyPlate anaerobe incubation system.
    Wiggs LS; Cavallaro JJ; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 10655335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a microtiter system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Savuto PS; Ellner PD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 6378969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of anaerobes on the Minitek System, compared to a conventional system.
    Holloway Y; Dankert J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979; 245(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 44787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a simple, rapid procedure for the presumptive identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Holland JW; Gagnet SM; Lewis SA; Stauffer LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 5(4):416-26. PubMed ID: 323283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Minitek system for direct identification of anaerobic rods from positive blood cultures.
    Polomski JC; McClatchey KD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 6759525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experiences with the API 20A system in routine species identification of anaerobes (author's transl)].
    Essers L; Haralambie E
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977 Jul; 238(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 333828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.
    Stargel D; Thompson FS; Phillips SE; Lombard GL; Dowell VR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Mar; 3(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 773959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative procedures for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Stargel MD; Lombard GL; Dowell VR
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 Jul; 44(7):709-22. PubMed ID: 354382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two single-plate incubation systems and the anaerobic chamber for the cultivation of anaerobic bacteria.
    Downes J; Mangels JI; Holden J; Ferraro MJ; Baron EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):246-8. PubMed ID: 2179257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of nutritive capacities of 10 broth media.
    Scythes KD; Louie M; Simor AE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1804-7. PubMed ID: 8784595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria.
    Halebian S; Harris B; Finegold SM; Rolfe RD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 6165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
    Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the performance of anaerobic bacteriology in a hospital laboratory.
    Morgan JR; Smith JA; Liu P
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 Feb; 30(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 321477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation of a coculture technique to the Minitek anaerobe system.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Bürger H; Groves D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):645-6. PubMed ID: 3886697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.