These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6345640)
1. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocals with blended bifocals. Borish IM; Hitzeman SA J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 6345640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocal vs. a standard multifocal lens design. Hitzeman SA; Myers CO J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):706-10. PubMed ID: 4056293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Acceptance of progressive lenses]. Krause K Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):94-9. PubMed ID: 8992091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double masked study of progressive addition lenses. Borish IM; Hitzeman SA; Brookman KE J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Oct; 51(10):933-43. PubMed ID: 7005296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of the Seiko P-3 and Varilux 2 progressive addition lenses. Brookman KE; Hall EA; Jensen MJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 3397493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of excessive add power on the acceptance of progressive addition lenses. Cho MH; Spear CH; Caplan L J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Sep; 62(9):672-5. PubMed ID: 1815000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient preference for a progressive addition multifocal lens (Varilux2) vs a standard multifocal lens design (ST-25). Spaulding DH J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Oct; 52(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 7320370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eye and head movement alterations in naïve progressive addition lens wearers. Hutchings N; Irving EL; Jung N; Dowling LM; Wells KA; Lillakas L Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 17324203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers. Bachman WG J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial. Sankaridurg PR; Sweeney DF; Holden BA; Naduvilath T; Velala I; Gora R; Krishnamachary M; Rao GN Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2327-34. PubMed ID: 14644714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of bifocal and progressive addition lenses on aviator target detection performance. Markovits AS; Reddix MD; O'Connell SR; Collyer PD Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Apr; 66(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7794220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Anisometropia and presbyopia: prescription of progressive lenses, a new approach]. Pouliquen de Liniere M; Hervault C; Meillon JP; Rocher P; Coulombel P; Van Effenterre G J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 May; 21(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 9759425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Hong Kong progressive lens myopia control study: study design and main findings. Edwards MH; Li RW; Lam CS; Lew JK; Yu BS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(9):2852-8. PubMed ID: 12202502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study of the effect of education on non-compliant behaviour in contact lens wear. Claydon BE; Efron N; Woods C Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9196677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bruinsma GM; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Stegenga B; van der Mei HC; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; Busscher HJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 43(12):3646-53. PubMed ID: 12454031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]