These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6345640)

  • 21. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation.
    Richdale K; Sinnott LT; Skadahl E; Nichols JJ
    Cornea; 2007 Feb; 26(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 17251807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of silicone hydrogel lens wear with a new multipurpose disinfection care product.
    Zigler L; Cedrone R; Evans D; Helbert-Green C; Shah T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Sep; 33(5):236-43. PubMed ID: 17873626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
    Dumbleton KA; Woods CA; Jones LW; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Management of progressive school myopia with topical atropine eyedrops and photochromic bifocal spectacles.
    Romano PE; Donovan JP
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 10960233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
    Dillehay SM; Miller MB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adaptability of a broad spectrum of randomly selected patients to a variable design progressive lens: report of a nationwide clinical trial.
    Young JM; Borish IM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Jun; 65(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 8089391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison between anti-reflection-coated and uncoated spectacle lenses for presbyopic highway patrol troopers.
    Bachman WG; Weaver JL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Feb; 70(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 10457687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Leyland MD; Langan L; Goolfee F; Lee N; Bloom PA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Jul; 16(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 12101459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis.
    Brennan NA; Coles ML; Connor HR; McIlroy RG
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 17420152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers.
    Stiegemeier MJ; Friederichs GJ; Hughes JL; Larsen S; Movic W; Potter WB
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Jul; 29(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 16698309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultraviolet light, cataracts, and spectacle wear.
    Wojno T; Singer D; Schultz RO
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1983 Aug; 15(8):729-32. PubMed ID: 6660717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparative evaluation of visual acuity after cataract extraction with monofocal, bifocal or progressive lenses implantation].
    Szweda E; Olejarz E; Kałuzny J; Czajkowski G; Seredyka-Burduk M
    Klin Oczna; 1999; 101(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 10786051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J; Young G; Hunt C; Henderson T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The advantages and disadvantages of bifocal lenses].
    Zanen A
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 264():71-8. PubMed ID: 9490160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying sources of verification errors in progressive addition lenses.
    Kollbaum PS; Brooks C
    Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 12645851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.
    Martin R; de Juan V; Rodriguez G; Martin S; Fonseca S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of corneal thickness of long-term contact lens wearers for different types of contact lenses.
    Iskeleli G; Onur U; Ustundag C; Ozkan S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Sep; 32(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 16974153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lower volumes of tear menisci in contact lens wearers with dry eye symptoms.
    Chen Q; Wang J; Shen M; Cai C; Li J; Cui L; Qu J; Lu F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3159-63. PubMed ID: 19279314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.