147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6345645)
21. [Perimetry yesterday and today].
Lachenmayr B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Jul; 193(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 3054254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical alternative for reducing the time needed to perform automated threshold perimetry.
Fingeret M
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):699-705. PubMed ID: 8576535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Quantification of isopters using semiautomated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in glaucoma patients with advanced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss].
Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zarnowski T; Krapp E; Paetzold J; Schiefer U; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):228-30. PubMed ID: 15510508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of data given by the Friedmann analyzer and Octopus 2000 automatic perimeter. Apropos of a case].
Haut J; Van Effenterre G; Rached JA; M'Rad N; Aaron C
Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1986 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 3542262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Modified threshold Amsler grid testing].
Lou BG
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Mar; 29(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 8404362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Study of changes in the central visual field in early computer-assisted diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Dzhumova MF; Birich TA
Vestn Oftalmol; 1994; 110(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 7810041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Possible advantages of visual evoked potentials and computerized static perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Bernardczyk-Meller J; Meller M; Załecki K
Klin Oczna; 1993 Feb; 95(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 8350575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Simple method of multiple central static perimetry and the initial results of its use].
Volkov VV; Sergeev VP; Bugrova AF
Vestn Oftalmol; 1983; (4):48-51. PubMed ID: 6636425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of semiautomated versus manual Goldmann kinetic perimetry in patients with visually significant glaucoma.
Ramirez AM; Chaya CJ; Gordon LK; Giaconi JA
J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18344756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Color perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects.
Hart WM; Gordon MO
Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 6717918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in subjects with suspected glaucoma (I): assessment of sensitivity thresholds].
Polo Llorens V; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez LE; Larrosa Poves JM; Abecia Martínez E; Cuevas Andrés R; Rojo Aragües A; Honrubia López FM
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11151126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Computerized perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Mocanu C
Oftalmologia; 1993; 37(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 8338826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds.
Maddess T; James AC; Goldberg I; Wine S; Dobinson J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Nov; 41(12):3827-32. PubMed ID: 11053282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patients with ocular hypertension have abnormal point scotopic thresholds in the superior hemifield.
Stirling RJ; Pawson P; Brimlow GM; Vernon SA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1608-17. PubMed ID: 8675404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
Chen YH; Wu JN; Chen JT; Lu DW
Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
