These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6346168)
1. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Thacker SB; Banta HD Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1983 Jun; 38(6):322-38. PubMed ID: 6346168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Episiotomy--a review of the literature]. Walfisch A; Hallak M Harefuah; 2002 Sep; 141(9):833-8, 856. PubMed ID: 12362493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Goyder K; Howarth L; Strachan B BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Review of the literature on advantages and disadvantages: episiotomy: only limited protection against ruptures--time for a revision?]. Haadem K Lakartidningen; 1998 Sep; 95(40):4354-8. PubMed ID: 9800455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up. Rådestad I; Olsson A; Nissen E; Rubertsson C Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18507580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Complete and complicated tears of the perineum in spite of preventive incision. A study of the risk factors and the short-term consequences]. Berthet J; Buchet A; Favier M; Racinet C J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 8360445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Andrews V; Sultan AH; Thakar R; Jones PW Birth; 2006 Jun; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 16732776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part II. Woolley RJ Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1995 Nov; 50(11):821-35. PubMed ID: 8545087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Fenner DE; Genberg B; Brahma P; Marek L; DeLancey JO Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. PubMed ID: 14710059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pelvic floor disorders four years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy]. Fritel X; Schaal JP; Fauconnier A; Bertrand V; Levet C; Pigné A Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Oct; 36(10):991-7. PubMed ID: 18801690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To cut or not to cut, that is the question: A review of the anatomy, the technique, risks, and benefits of an episiotomy. Muhleman MA; Aly I; Walters A; Topale N; Tubbs RS; Loukas M Clin Anat; 2017 Apr; 30(3):362-372. PubMed ID: 28195378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]