BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6347722)

  • 41. Hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of infertility: a five years review. (FGAE, 2001 -5).
    Kitilla T
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Oct; 48(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21280428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The current state of hysterosalpingography.
    Wolf DM; Spataro RF
    Radiographics; 1988 Nov; 8(6):1041-58. PubMed ID: 3060910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Hysterosalpingography in adnexal tuberculosis].
    Ledoux-Lebard G; Allain YM; Pallardy G; Gilloux A
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1968; 49(8):569-76. PubMed ID: 5700902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Hysterosalpingography in endometriosis: performance and interpretation.
    Kilcoyne A; O'Shea A; Gervais DA; Lee SI
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jun; 45(6):1680-1693. PubMed ID: 31897682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Sono-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal infertility].
    Lupaşcu I; Vegheş S; Solomiţchi V; David C; Boian I
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2003; 107(4):841-5. PubMed ID: 14756031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Virtual hysterosalpingography: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients.
    Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Vallejos J; Baronio M; Carrascosa J
    Abdom Imaging; 2011 Feb; 36(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 20458478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Contrast hysterosonography: indications and technic].
    van den Brûle FA; Wéry O; Gaspard UJ
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Nov; 53(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 9887657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Features of hysterosalpingogram in verified genital tuberculosis].
    Kochorova MN; Semenovskiĭ AV
    Probl Tuberk; 2001; (2):31-3. PubMed ID: 11490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: a comparison with hysteroscopy.
    Roma Dalfó A; Ubeda B; Ubeda A; Monzón M; Rotger R; Ramos R; Palacio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1405-9. PubMed ID: 15505312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients.
    Waheed KB; Albassam MA; AlShamrani AG; Aloumi SA; Amin MS; Rashid L; AlGodayan SM; Ahmad SB
    Saudi Med J; 2019 Oct; 40(10):1067-1071. PubMed ID: 31588489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hysterosalpingographic diagnosis of uterine adenomyoma.
    Hofmann GE; Acosta AA; Gaddy NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 2):885-7. PubMed ID: 2649831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Dynamic ultrasonic hysteroscopy].
    Battaglia S; Linciano M; Bazzocchi M; Comelli S; Zuiani C; Orlando P; Giacomello F
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 3287496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Space occupying lesions of the uterus at hysterography.
    Kendall-Smith IM
    Australas Radiol; 1975 Dec; 19(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 1225295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for diagnosis of tubal infertility.
    Zimmer M; Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk E; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Michniewicz J; Pomorski M; Wiatrowski A
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2011; 32(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 22167149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Comparison between hysterosonography and hysterosalpinography in the study of endometrial abnormalities in infertility patients].
    López Navarrete JA; Herrera Otero JM; Quiroga Feuchter G; Munguía Quiroz F; Ramírez Angulo JA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jun; 71():277-83. PubMed ID: 14515657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Hysterography and hysterosalpingography].
    Fochem K
    Rontgenpraxis; 1983 Dec; 36(12):413-20. PubMed ID: 6665634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Infertility work-up: To what degree does laparoscopy change the management strategy based on hysterosalpingography findings?
    Berker B; Şükür YE; Aytaç R; Atabekoğlu CS; Sönmezer M; Özmen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1785-90. PubMed ID: 26399775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice?
    Dhaliwal LK; Gupta KR; Aggarwal N
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 10499744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography.
    Socolov D; Boian I; Boiculese L; Tamba B; Anghelache-Lupascu I; Socolov R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Hysterosalpingography in the 1990s.
    Yoder IC; Hall DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Oct; 157(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 1892018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.