These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6349915)
41. Caries development in a young population managed by a restrictive attitude to radiography and operative intervention: II. A study at the surface level. Lith A; Lindstrand C; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 12087440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs. Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions. Eli I; Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Kaffe I J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 8990680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Caries rates for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar and the distal surface of the second primary molar from 6 to 12 years of age in Sweden. Mejàre I; Stenlund H Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):454-61. PubMed ID: 11093018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Variation in radiographic interpretation and restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries among dentists in Norway. Espelid I; Tveit A; Haugejorden O; Riordan PJ Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 13(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 3855730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age. Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Radiographic and laser fluorescence methods have no benefits for detecting caries in primary teeth. Mendes FM; Novaes TF; Matos R; Bittar DG; Piovesan C; Gimenez T; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Braga MM Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 22907166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Pattern of dental caries experience on tooth surfaces in an adult population. Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 34(3):174-83. PubMed ID: 16674749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of bitewing radiography and interdental transillumination as adjuncts to the clinical identification of approximal caries in posterior teeth. Sidi AD; Naylor MN Br Dent J; 1988 Jan; 164(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 3422155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. A reappraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior approximal caries. Kidd EA; Pitts NB Br Dent J; 1990 Oct; 169(7):195-200. PubMed ID: 2223291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Behaviour of approximal carious lesions assessed by clinical examination after tooth separation and radiography: a 2.5-year longitudinal study in young adults. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B Caries Res; 1999; 33(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 10529525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [The importance of the bitewing image in the early recognition of caries and periodontal diseases in children and adolescents]. Poppe B; Faustmann U; Saffan G; Dietrich F Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 2150460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Systems for grading approximal carious lesions and overlaps diagnosed from bitewing radiographs. Proposals for future standardization. Pitts NB Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1984 Apr; 12(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 6584261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters. Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Radiographic recognition and distribution of approximal carious lesions in New Zealand undergraduate dental students. Chandler NP; Ng BP; Monteith BD N Z Dent J; 2005 Dec; 101(4):106-9. PubMed ID: 16416748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis on posterior teeth of children seen at a Nigerian teaching hospital. Popoola BO; Denloye OO; Ajayi DM; Sote EO Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 39(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 20632671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The anticariogenic effect of sugar-free gum containing CPP-ACP nanocomplexes on approximal caries determined using digital bitewing radiography. Morgan MV; Adams GG; Bailey DL; Tsao CE; Fischman SL; Reynolds EC Caries Res; 2008; 42(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 18446025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prevalence of approximal caries in posterior teeth in 15-year-old Swedish teenagers in relation to their caries experience at 3 years of age. Alm A; Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D Caries Res; 2007; 41(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 17713340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]