These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6350342)
1. Evaluation of the updated MS-2 Bacterial Identification system in comparison with the API 20E system. DiPersio JR; Dyke JW; Vannest RD J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 6350342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of the MS-2 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a collaborative study with blindly assigned reference stains. Yamane N; Kato H; Saitoh Y; Mukojima T; Matsuoka K J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1135-9. PubMed ID: 6394615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification. Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the four-hour Micro-ID technique for direct identification of oxidase-negative, Gram-negative rods from blood cultures. Appelbaum PC; Schick SF; Kellogg JA J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 6999020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from BACTEC bottles by use of the MS-2 system with updated bacterial identification software. Dipersio JR; Ficorilli SM; Varga FJ J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1202-4. PubMed ID: 6394624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two methods for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; Von Kuster LC; Charache P Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Sep; 78(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 7051807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 7026608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system. Barry AL; Badal RE J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 16(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 6749890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods. Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro activity of aztreonam against gram negative bacteria from clinical specimens and its comparison with other commonly used antibiotics. Qadri SM; Belobraydic KA Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1986 Apr; 8(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 3088346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters. Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Apr; 32(4):931-4. PubMed ID: 8027345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of micro-ID with API 20E for identification of Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia species. Ekwall E; Dimander M Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 1(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 6756906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae. Swanson EC; Collins MT J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Bacterial Diagnostics Kits and Systems at an Instructional Workshop. Fung DYC; Goldschmidt MC; Cox NA J Food Prot; 1984 Jan; 47(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 30925643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Susceptibilities of clinical bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents. A study mainly focused on imipenem. Reported by the Research Group for Testing Imipenem Susceptibility on Clinical Isolates]. Igari J Jpn J Antibiot; 1990 Nov; 43(11):1956-2002. PubMed ID: 2287060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Interest of gamma-glutamyltransferase in "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)]. Giammanco G; Buissière J; Toucas M; Brault G; Le Minor L Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1980; 131A(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 6104464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae]. Scheftel JM; Barth JG; Vincent M Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989; 47(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2665580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]