These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6351164)

  • 1. Blood flow determination using recursive processing: a digital radiographic method.
    Kruger RA; Bateman W; Liu PY; Nelson JA
    Radiology; 1983 Oct; 149(1):293-8. PubMed ID: 6351164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic tomographic digital subtraction angiography using temporal filtration.
    Kruger RA; Nelson JA; Ghosh-Roy D; Miller FJ; Anderson RE; Liu PY
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):863-7. PubMed ID: 6342037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric imaging of blood flow.
    Strauss LG; Busch HP; Menges W; Clorius JH; Lorenz WJ; Georgi M
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Feb; 8(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 3281836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Newer subtraction and filtration techniques.
    Nelson JA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 3887481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Chan HP; Giger ML; Duda EE
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):799-803. PubMed ID: 3890012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Newer subtraction and filtration techniques.
    Nelson JA
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(4):192-8. PubMed ID: 3531782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tomosynthesis applied to digital subtraction angiography.
    Kruger RA; Sedaghati M; Roy DG; Liu P; Nelson JA; Kubal W; Del Rio P
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):805-8. PubMed ID: 6379747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques.
    Ovitt TW; Newell JD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3887480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the processing functions of a digital subtraction angiography image processor.
    Maher KP; Malone JF; Hurley GD; McInerney DP
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):62-8. PubMed ID: 3280062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital tomosynthesis: technique for electronic reconstructive tomography.
    Maravilla KR; Murry RC; Horner S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 6349310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Work in progress: the application of temporal filtering techniques to hybrid subtraction in digital subtraction angiography.
    Riederer SJ; Brody WR; Enzmann DR; Hall AL; Maier JK
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):859-62. PubMed ID: 6342036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction angiography systems: assessing performance with phantoms.
    Goodsitt MM; Abbate L; Hesselink JR
    Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):811-5. PubMed ID: 3895295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital subtraction angiography using a temporal bandpass filter: initial clinical results.
    Nelson JA; Miller FJ; Kruger RA; Liu PY; Bateman W
    Radiology; 1982 Nov; 145(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 6753014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography: overview of technical principles.
    Harrington DP; Boxt LM; Murray PD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 6751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intravenous angiography utilizing digital video subtraction.
    Ovitt TW; Christenson PC; Hillman BJ
    Ariz Med; 1980 May; 37(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 6992750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of arterial blood flow measurements by digital angiography.
    Bürsch JH; Hahne HJ; Brennecke R; Grönemeier D; Heintzen PH
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 7291540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Depth determination on stereoscopic digital subtraction angiograms.
    Higashida Y; Hirata Y; Saito R; Doudanuki S; Bussaka H; Takahashi M
    Radiology; 1988 Aug; 168(2):560-2. PubMed ID: 3293114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital subtraction angiography: fundamental noise characteristics.
    Balter S; Ergun D; Tscholl E; Buchmann F; Verhoeven L
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 6374758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.