These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6352554)

  • 1. Effectiveness of antiscatter grids in digital subtraction angiography.
    Kruger RA; Sorenson JA; Niklason LT
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 6352554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA): new perspectives in angiography.
    Buchmann F
    Neurosurg Rev; 1985; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 3895038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques.
    Ovitt TW; Newell JD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3887480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of antiscatter grids in digital radiography. A phantom study.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; Gur D
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jun; 29(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 8088973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a digital subtraction angiography unit.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; Rauschkolb EN
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):613-7. PubMed ID: 7048418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy subtraction angiography is comparable to digital subtraction angiography in terms of iodine Rose SNR.
    Burton CS; Mayo JR; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5925. PubMed ID: 27806612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas.
    Modic MT; Berlin AJ; Weinstein MA
    Ophthalmology; 1982 May; 89(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 7048183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography: fundamental noise characteristics.
    Balter S; Ergun D; Tscholl E; Buchmann F; Verhoeven L
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 6374758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Chan HP; Giger ML; Duda EE
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):799-803. PubMed ID: 3890012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Phys Med Biol; 1982 Jun; 27(6):785-803. PubMed ID: 7111390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Comparison with conventional aortography.
    Buonocore E; Meaney TF; Borkowski GP; Pavlicek W; Gallagher J
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 7012920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measurement of image-producing properties of DSA equipment].
    Busch HP; Strauss LG; Freimarck RD
    Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6431530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio.
    Chan HP; Lam KL; Wu YZ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 2215411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tomographic digital subtraction angiography: initial clinical studies using tomosynthesis. Work in progress.
    deVries N; Miller FJ; Wojtowycz MM; Brown PR; Yandow DR; Nelson JA; Kruger RA
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):239-41. PubMed ID: 3898219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Work load and financial implications for a neuroradiology department.
    Kingsley DP; Butler P; Rowe GM; Travis RC; Wylie IG
    Neuroradiology; 1989; 31(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 2674769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital subtraction angiography].
    Gmelin E; Arlart IP
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1987; 126():1-192. PubMed ID: 2886105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.