110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6356137)
1. The evolution of the ethics of informed consent.
Fletcher JC
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():187-228. PubMed ID: 6356137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Why law pervades medicine: an essay on ethics in health care.
Scott C
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2000; 14(1):245-303. PubMed ID: 12705270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion politics, science, and research ethics: take down the wall of separation.
Fletcher JC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():95-121. PubMed ID: 11645741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of research with children: the evolution from exclusion to inclusion.
Alexander D
J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15017949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations.
Morris MC
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16264082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mental health aspects of the informed consent process.
Boverman M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():229-41. PubMed ID: 6634730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Considerations on the problem of Oswiecim morality].
Gawalewicz A
Przegl Lek; 1967; 23(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 4891398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Studies on the mortality of Oswieczim prisoners].
Glińska A
Przegl Lek; 1967; 23(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 4891396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nuremberg forgotten. The deplorable origins of informed consent.
Lund P
Mouth; 1999; 19(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 10873140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of the role of an applied bioethicist in a research hospital.
Fletcher JC; Boverman M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():131-58. PubMed ID: 6634727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part I: History of medical ethics, the physician and the patient, the physician's relationship to other physicians, the physician and society. Ad Hoc Committee on Medical Ethics, American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med; 1984 Jul; 101(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 6375501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Public health. Ethics and the conduct of public health surveillance.
Fairchild AL; Bayer R
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5658):631-2. PubMed ID: 14752148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Congressional rites of passage for the rights of alcoholics.
Lewis JS
Alcohol Health Res World; 1988; 12(4):240-51. PubMed ID: 10314322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maintaining informed consent for doctor-patient confidentiality: more serious failings in the HHS medical regulations.
Sobel R
J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 14682371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical ethics cases: moral conflict or confusion?
Kanoti GA
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 8219317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
