These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6361050)
1. Evaluation of the AutoSCAN-3, a device for reading microdilution trays. DeGirolami PC; Eichelberger KA; Salfity LC; Rizzo MF J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 18(6):1292-5. PubMed ID: 6361050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary evaluation of the autoSCAN-3, an instrument for automated reading an interpretation of microdilution trays: identification of aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Ellner PD; Myers DA J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Sep; 14(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 7026602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the autoSCAN-4 automated reader. Baker CN; Stocker SA; Rhoden DL; Thornsberry C J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 3700598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated reading of MIC microdilution trays containing fluorogenic enzyme substrates with the Sensititre Autoreader. Staneck JL; Allen SD; Harris EE; Tilton RC J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 4031033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli using Baxter MicroScan rapid fluorogenic panels and autoSCAN-W/A. Godsey JH; Bascomb S; Bonnette T; Kangas M; Link K; Richards K; Tomfohrde KM Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 May; 39(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 1881675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Wider system, a new computer-assisted image-processing device for bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Cantón R; Pérez-Vázquez M; Oliver A; Sánchez Del Saz B; Gutiérrez MO; Martínez-Ferrer M; Baquero F J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 38(4):1339-46. PubMed ID: 10747104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multilaboratory study of the Biomic automated well-reading instrument versus MicroScan WalkAway for reading MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility and identification panels. Fader RC; Weaver E; Fossett R; Toyras M; Vanderlaan J; Gibbs D; Wang A; Thierjung N J Clin Microbiol; 2013 May; 51(5):1548-54. PubMed ID: 23486713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Titertek Multiskan for determining minimal inhibitory concentration endpoints. Genta VM; McCarthy LR; Herrick M; Rose F Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Jul; 22(1):151-3. PubMed ID: 7125627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci using Baxter MicroScan rapid fluorogenic panels and autoSCAN-W/A. Bascomb S; Godsey JH; Kangas M; Nea L; Tomfohrde KM Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 May; 39(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 1881676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the automated reading and incubation system with Sensititre plates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Chapin KC; Musgnug MC J Clin Microbiol; 2003 May; 41(5):1951-6. PubMed ID: 12734233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid and overnight microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing with the Sensititre Breakpoint Autoreader system. Nolte FS; Krisher KK; Beltran LA; Christianson NP; Sheridan GE J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jun; 26(6):1079-84. PubMed ID: 3384920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing. Hansen SL; Freedy PK J Clin Microbiol; 1983 May; 17(5):878-86. PubMed ID: 6863508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. Thornsberry C; Anhalt JP; Washington JA; McCarthy LR; Schoenknecht FD; Sherris JC; Spencer HJ J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Sep; 12(3):375-90. PubMed ID: 6783678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Autoscan Walkaway system for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. Kelly MT; Leicester C J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jun; 30(6):1568-71. PubMed ID: 1624575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of 500 gram negative isolates to determine the number of major susceptibility interpretation discrepancies between the Vitek and MicroScan Walkaway for 9 antimicrobial agents. Rittenhouse SF; Miller LA; Utrup LJ; Poupard JA Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Sep; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8950521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates. Chapin KC; Musgnug MC J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):4751-4. PubMed ID: 14532215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates. Kiehn TE; Capitolo C; Armstrong D J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 7107862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary reading of antibiogram by microdilution for clinical isolates in urine culture. Rodríguez-Guerrero E; Moya-López J; Expósito-Ruiz M; Navarro-Marí JM; Gutiérrez-Fernández J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Mar; 43(3):517-524. PubMed ID: 38214841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory evaluation of the Anderson Technical semiautomated susceptibility testing system. McKinley GA; Fagerberg DJ; George BA Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Dec; 20(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 7325643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]