These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6361240)
1. Resin-bonded retainers. Part I: Resin bond to electrolytically etched nonprecious alloys. Thompson VP; Del Castillo E; Livaditis GJ J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Dec; 50(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 6361240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin bond to electrolytically etched cobalt-chromium alloys. Jokela-Hietamäki M; Rantanen T Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Feb; 95(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 3551039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A chemical etching system for creating micromechanical retention in resin-bonded retainers. Livaditis GJ J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Aug; 56(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 3531467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tensile bond strengths of an electrolytically and chemically etched base metal. Aquilino SA; Diaz-Arnold AM; Krueger GE Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 2196897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tensile bond strengths of Comspan to electrolytically etched metal with and without enamel bonding agent. Haywood VB; Lundeen TF; Taylor DF Dent Mater; 1987 Feb; 3(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 3552806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro study of the tensile strength of the resin bond between chemically etched non-noble alloy and enamel. Kuyinu E; Levine WA; Grisius R; Fenster R J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 2407827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin-bonded retainers. el-Sherif MH; el-Messery A; Halhoul MN J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 2072321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear bond strengths and scanning electron microscope evaluation of three different retentive methods for resin-bonded retainers. Re GJ; Kaiser DA; Malone WF; Garcia-Godoy F J Prosthet Dent; 1988 May; 59(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 3290452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of electrolytic and chemical etch systems on the resin-to-metal tensile bond strength. Krueger GE; Diaz-Arnold AM; Aquilino SA; Scandrett FR J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Nov; 64(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 2090823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Bond Strength of Resin Bonded Bridge Retainers to Abutments of Differing Proportions of Enamel and Composite. Durey K; Nattress B Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26415336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tensile strength of five types of retention for resin-bonded prostheses. Bastos MT; Mondelli J; Ishikiriama A; Navarro MF J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 1687153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The bond strengths of various adhesives used for Maryland Bridges. Flood AM; Brockhurst P; Harcourt JK Aust Dent J; 1989 Oct; 34(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2684115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a chemical etching solution for nickel-chromium-beryllium and chromium-cobalt alloys. Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Borracchini A; Bertelli E J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 2691655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of three different surface treatments on the tensile strength of the resin bond to nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. Kohli S; Levine WA; Grisius RJ; Fenster RK J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 2404105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]