These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6361637)
1. Subperiosteal implant design based on peri-implant tissue behavior. James RA N Y J Dent; 1983 Dec; 53(8):407-14. PubMed ID: 6361637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolutionary design trends in the mandibular subperiosteal implant. Linkow LI J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):402-38. PubMed ID: 6394772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Some factors affecting dental implant design. Privitzer E; Widera O; Tesk JA J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 1176507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The subperiosteal implant denture program at the University of Southern California. Part III. Design of implant denture substructure. Bodine RL; Vakay LR; Sullivan DY; Lund DF; Yanase RT J Oral Implantol; 1977; 7(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 270590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The ramus-endosseous, anterior-subperiosteal implant technique for the severely atrophic mandible. Byland JH J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 3519996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [History of the development of the subperiosteal implant, its use and alternative suggestions]. Muratori G Dent Cadmos; 1985 Jan; 53(1):105-6, 109-14, 117-9. PubMed ID: 3894067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Current status of the mandibular subperiosteal implant prosthesis. Mentag PJ Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 6995182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of laser application on periodontal and peri-implant wound healing. Schwarz F; Aoki A; Sculean A; Becker J Periodontol 2000; 2009; 51():79-108. PubMed ID: 19878471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A mandibular subperiosteal implant technique that saves working time, gives patients more secure denture. Harris BW J Oral Implantol; 1982; 10(2):208-26. PubMed ID: 6759668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The button implant: a method which avoids major implant surgery in the treatment of complete edentulousness]. Muratori G Dent Cadmos; 1985 Apr; 53(7):87-8, 91-2, 95-6. PubMed ID: 3912216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The implant denture mesostructure bar, separate bilateral versus anterior continuous. Travis CT; Bodine RL J Oral Implantol; 1982; 10(2):233-54. PubMed ID: 6759669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants. Fettig RH; Kay JF J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys. Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Ohto T; Shin K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 12074454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]