These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6361637)
41. [Removable denture: interaction with the periodontium and the edentulous ridge]. Battistuzzi PG; Käyser AF; Keltijens HM; Plasmans PJ; Cordioli GP; Favero GA G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1984; 3(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 6396256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Provisionalization in implant prosthodontics for the partially edentulous arch--Part II. Binon PP Dent Implantol Update; 1995 Aug; 6(8):57-61. PubMed ID: 9525150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Intramucosal inserts for retention of removable maxillary prostheses. Guaccio RA Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 6995185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Results of a multi-year study of endosseous and subperiosteal dental implants]. Randzio J; Kirlic E Zahnarztl Prax; 1984 Oct; 35(10):386, 388, 390-4. PubMed ID: 6594843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The use of hydroxylapatite to coat subperiosteal implants. Golec TS J Oral Implantol; 1985; 12(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 2999414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The influence of implant elastic modulus on the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants. Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Nov; 15(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 7309769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Templates as an aid in implantology]. Meijer HJ; Batenburg RH; Wietsma AK; Reintsema H; Raghoebar GM Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Jul; 105(7):238-41. PubMed ID: 11928426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Twenty-five years experience with the subperiosteal implant denture. Bodine RL J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):124-45. PubMed ID: 385898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Methods and materials for provisionalization in implant prosthodontics--Part II. Federick DR Dent Implantol Update; 1995 Dec; 6(12):92-5. PubMed ID: 9525159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Load-transfer characteristics of mandibular subperiosteal implants. Jones SD; Caputo AA; Benson D; Borggrebe E J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 379321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Design modifications of the ramus frame implant. Misch CE J Oral Implantol; 1980; 9(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 7012376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Stress registered by the tooth support of a partial denture using a photoelasticometric method]. Buch D Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1981; 10(4-5):317-30. PubMed ID: 7031817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Intramucosal implants. A review of concepts and techniques. Single inserts and tandem denserts. Evasic RW J Oral Implantol; 1982; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 7050401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The mandibular full subperiosteal implant. Consideration of the technique. Wilson R Br Dent J; 1982 Oct; 153(7):267-71. PubMed ID: 6958295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]