These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6362327)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for the identification of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium species.
    Vege A; Dibb WL; Hofstad T
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1983 Oct; 91(5):371-2. PubMed ID: 6362327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ATB 32 A system for identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens.
    Looney WJ; Gallusser AJ; Modde HK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1519-24. PubMed ID: 2199516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Isolation and differentiation of Bacteroides, Fusobacterium and Sphaerophorus species].
    Werner H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1974; 228(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 4154686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.
    Kitch TT; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Nov; 27(11):2509-13. PubMed ID: 2681252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anaerobic bacteriology. Isolation and identification of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium from human sources.
    Cadogan-Cowper G; Wilkinson RG
    Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci; 1974 Dec; 52(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 4618471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biochemical characteristics of Fusobacterium and Bacteroides species from mouse cecum.
    Syed SA
    Can J Microbiol; 1972 Feb; 18(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 4111817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple and expedient methods of differentiation among Bacteroides, Sphaerophorus and Fusobacterium.
    Ninomiya K; Otani F; Koosaka S; Kamiya H; Ueno K
    Jpn J Med Sci Biol; 1972 Apr; 25(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 4569597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The isolation and identification of Bacteroides spp. from the normal human gingival flora.
    Duerden BI
    J Med Microbiol; 1980 Feb; 13(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 6102159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility of Bacteroides, Prevotella and Fusobacterium species isolated from patients of the N. N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia.
    Shilnikova II; Dmitrieva NV
    Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():15-8. PubMed ID: 25157873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the API ZYM system for identification of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium species.
    Hofstad T
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1980; 168(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 6105615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the recovery of strict anaerobes by conventional procedures and with an anaerobic cabinet.
    Collee JG; Watt B
    J Med Microbiol; 1972 Nov; 5(4):P13. PubMed ID: 4566881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Keifer JC; Venbrux HJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Methodologic problems in the detection of indole formation by anaerobic pathogens].
    Höhne C; Hübner G; Sandow D
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Jul; 265(3-4):314-22. PubMed ID: 3314261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Identification of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium using antibiotic- and bile-impregnated disks].
    Kultaev MS; Pashkov EP; Kochemasova ZN; Bykov AS
    Antibiot Med Biotekhnol; 1985 Jul; 30(7):507-11. PubMed ID: 4051470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification, and susceptibility to seven antimicrobial agents, of 61 gram-negative anaerobic rods from periodontal pockets.
    Abu-Fanas SH; Drucker DB; Hull PS; Reeder JC; Ganguli LA
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1901873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The identification of gram-negative anaerobic bacilli isolated from clinical infections.
    Duerden BI
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Apr; 84(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 6987300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from vented blood-culture bottles.
    Martin WJ; Wilhelm PA; Bruckner D
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S59-61. PubMed ID: 6372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study of different substrates as the nutrient base of a culture medium for Bacteroides and Fusobacterium].
    Baltrashevich AK; Raskin BM; Komarovskaia TP; Mel'nikova VA
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1982 Dec; (12):72-6. PubMed ID: 7158165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in prevalence and susceptibility of obligate anaerobes in clinical veterinary practice.
    Hirsh DC; Indiveri MC; Jang SS; Biberstein EL
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1985 May; 186(10):1086-9. PubMed ID: 3997623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.