These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6362689)

  • 1. Investigation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography.
    Greenbaum RA; Evans TR
    Br Heart J; 1984 Feb; 51(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 6362689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital subtraction intravenous left ventricular angiography: comparison with conventional intraventricular angiography.
    Goldberg HL; Borer JS; Moses JW; Fisher J; Cohen B; Skelly NT
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 1(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 6338086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
    Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital subtraction ventriculography in determining global and regional left ventricular parameters compared to left catheterization cardiography].
    Eichstädt H; Langer M; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1984 Jun; 24(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 6382430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Videodensitometric assessment of right and left ventricular functions by digital subtraction angiography].
    Ikeda H; Yoshiga O; Shibao K; Hidaka Y; Okabe K; Yoh M; Hiyamuta K; Sugi K; Ohkita Y; Koga Y
    J Cardiol; 1987 Sep; 17(3):587-95. PubMed ID: 3331162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of conventional contrast ventriculography and digital subtraction ventriculography.
    Felix R; Eichstädt H; Kempter H; Kewitz A; Banzer D; Schmutzler H; Marhoff P
    Clin Cardiol; 1983 Jun; 6(6):265-76. PubMed ID: 6872369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
    Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of left ventricular performance during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a study by intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography.
    Norell MS; Lyons JP; Gershlick AH; Gardener JE; Rothman MT; Layton CA; Balcon R
    Br Heart J; 1988 Apr; 59(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 2967085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of left ventricular performance using digital subtraction angiography.
    Kronenberg MW; Price RR; Smith CW; Robertson RM; Perry JM; Pickens DR; Domanski MJ; Partain CL; Friesinger GC
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 51(5):837-42. PubMed ID: 6338690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital angiography: a new method for the study of the left ventricle].
    Ghio S; Alerci M; Cornalba P; Rota L; De Servi S; Specchia G; Montemartini C; Di Guglielmo L
    G Ital Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 16(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 3519346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricle evaluation by digital video subtraction angiocardiography.
    Engels PH; Ludwig JW; Verhoeven LA
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 7048415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of coronary artery visualization during routine intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography.
    Haggman D; Detrano R; Simpfendorfer C
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1986; 12(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 3513964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise.
    Birchler B; Hess OM; Murakami T; Niederer P; Anliker M; Krayenbuehl HP
    Eur Heart J; 1985 Jun; 6(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 3899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography--an alternative to traditional angiocardiography?].
    Spiller P; Schmiel FK
    Klin Wochenschr; 1984 Nov; 62(22):1049-58. PubMed ID: 6392725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitation of left ventricular dimensions and function by digital video subtraction angiography.
    Higgins CB; Norris SL; Gerber KH; Slutsky RA; Ashburn WL; Baily N
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 7048414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of 10-milliliter digital subtraction ventriculograms compared with standard cineangiograms.
    Tobis JM; Nalcioglu O; Johnston WD; Seibert A; Roeck W; Iseri LT; Elkayam U; Henry WL
    Am Heart J; 1983 Jun; 105(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 6344605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: reliability of densitometric determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction].
    Machnig T; Lehmkuhl H; Reynen K; Engels G; Eicker B; Barth K; Bachmann K
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Jul; 82(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 8379245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reliability of digital subtraction angiocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular function and physical stress].
    Spiller P; Fischbach T; Jehle J; Lauber A; Pölitz B; Schmiel FK; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Nov; 72(11):681-7. PubMed ID: 6362246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction angiography of the left ventricle.
    Foster CJ; Butler P; Freer CE
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Nov; 61(731):1009-13. PubMed ID: 3061545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
    Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.