These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6362938)

  • 21. Comparative in situ topoproteome analysis reveals differences in patch test-induced eczema: cytotoxicity-dominated nickel versus pleiotrope pollen reaction.
    Eyerich K; Böckelmann R; Pommer AJ; Foerster S; Hofmeister H; Huss-Marp J; Cavani A; Behrendt H; Ring J; Gollnick H; Bonnekoh B; Traidl-Hoffmann C
    Exp Dermatol; 2010 Jun; 19(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 19758337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In situ immunological characterization of the infiltrating cells in positive patch tests.
    Ralfkiaer E; Lange Wantzin G
    Br J Dermatol; 1984 Jul; 111(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 6378243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distribution of interleukin-2 receptor bearing lymphocytes in the skin. A comparative study of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, tuberculin reaction and cutaneous T cell lymphoma.
    Klareskog L; Scheynius A; Tjernlund U
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1986; 66(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 2426894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phenotypic characterization in situ of inflammatory cells in pityriasis (tinea) versicolor.
    Scheynius A; Faergemann J; Forsum U; Sjöberg O
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1984; 64(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 6084917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pollen grains induce a rapid and biphasic eczematous immune response in atopic eczema patients.
    Eyerich K; Huss-Marp J; Darsow U; Wollenberg A; Foerster S; Ring J; Behrendt H; Traidl-Hoffmann C
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 145(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 17914273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Immunophenotype of lymphoid cells in positive patch tests of allergic contact dermatitis.
    McMillan EM; Stoneking L; Burdick S; Cowan I; Husain-Hamzavi SL
    J Invest Dermatol; 1985 Mar; 84(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 3156192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contribution of the CD28 molecule to allergic and irritant-induced skin reactions in CD28 -/- mice.
    Kondo S; Kooshesh F; Wang B; Fujisawa H; Sauder DN
    J Immunol; 1996 Dec; 157(11):4822-9. PubMed ID: 8943384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The simultaneous presence of Langerhans' cell and interdigitating cell antigenic markers on inflammatory dendritic cells.
    Alegre VA; MacDonald DM; Poulter LW
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1986 May; 64(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 3527504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Allergic contact dermatitis from topical fluorouracil.
    Goette DK; Odom RB; Owens R
    Arch Dermatol; 1977 Feb; 113(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 836695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Topical cyclosporin A in nickel contact hypersensitivity: results of a preliminary clinical and immunohistochemical investigation.
    Aldridge RD; Sewell HF; King G; Thomson AW
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1986 Dec; 66(3):582-9. PubMed ID: 3552335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lymphocytes and Langerhans cells in patch tests. An immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study.
    Kanerva L; Ranki A; Lauharanta J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 6388994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Results of patch tests with mite components in atopic dermatitis patients].
    Sakurai M
    Arerugi; 1996 Apr; 45(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 8687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions.
    Homey B; von Schilling C; Blümel J; Schuppe HC; Ruzicka T; Ahr HJ; Lehmann P; Vohr HW
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 153(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 9875302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and immunologic variables in skin of patients with atopic eczema and either positive or negative atopy patch test reactions.
    Langeveld-Wildschut EG; Bruijnzeel PL; Mudde GC; Versluis C; Van Ieperen-Van Dijk AG; Bihari IC; Knol EF; Thepen T; Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA; van Reijsen FC
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2000 May; 105(5):1008-16. PubMed ID: 10808184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
    Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
    Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of expression of surface-bound immunoglobulin E on antigen-presenting cells in cutaneous tissue between patients with allergic, irritant and atopic dermatitis.
    Ward KA; Todd D; Thornton C; Walsh M; Burrows D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 1935040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The disturbance of epidermal barrier function in atopy patch test reactions in atopic eczema.
    Gfesser M; Rakoski J; Ring J
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 135(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 8915146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impaired responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to nickel in patients with nickel-allergic contact dermatitis and concomitant atopic dermatitis.
    Buchvald D; Lundeberg L
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):484-92. PubMed ID: 15030331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Functional CD86 (B7-2/B70) is predominantly expressed on Langerhans cells in atopic dermatitis.
    Ohki O; Yokozeki H; Katayama I; Umeda T; Azuma M; Okumura K; Nishioka K
    Br J Dermatol; 1997 Jun; 136(6):838-45. PubMed ID: 9217814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Irritant contact dermatitis: a review.
    Slodownik D; Lee A; Nixon R
    Australas J Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):1-9; quiz 10-1. PubMed ID: 18186838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.