These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6363526)
1. A minimal apparatus method for counting bacteria: comparison with reference method in surveying beef carcasses at three commercial abattoirs. Hudson WR; Roberts TA; Whelehan OP J Hyg (Lond); 1983 Dec; 91(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 6363526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of incubation temperature and site of sampling on assessment of the numbers of bacteria on red meat carcasses at commercial abattoirs. Roberts TA; MacFie HJ; Hudson WR J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Dec; 85(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 7462589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir. McEvoy JM; Doherty AM; Finnerty M; Sheridan JJ; McGuire L; Blair IS; McDowell DA; Harrington D Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 May; 30(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 10792669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacteriological status of beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir before and after slaughterline improvements. Hudson WR; Roberts TA; Whelehan OP Epidemiol Infect; 1987 Feb; 98(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 3556439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of carcass contamination with E. coli O157 before and after washing with water at abattoirs in Nigeria. Bello M; Lawan MK; Kwaga JK; Raji MA Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 150(2-3):184-6. PubMed ID: 21843905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs. Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Rapid counting of bacteria isolated from cattle, swine and sheep carcasses using the resazurin method]. Labadie J; Doumbia M Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Jun; 179(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6382877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacteriological evaluation of groups of beef carcasses before the wash at six Alberta abattoirs. Jericho KW; Bradley JA; Kozub GC J Appl Bacteriol; 1994 Dec; 77(6):631-4. PubMed ID: 7822222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative distribution of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli on beef carcasses and raw beef at retail establishments. Martínez-Chávez L; Cabrera-Diaz E; Pérez-Montaño JA; Garay-Martínez LE; Varela-Hernández JJ; Castillo A; Lucia L; Ávila-Novoa MG; Cardona-López MA; Gutiérrez-González P; Martínez-Gonzáles NE Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 210():149-55. PubMed ID: 26125489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of aerial counts at different sites in beef and sheep abattoirs and the relationship between aerial and beef carcass contamination. Okraszska-Lasica W; Bolton DJ; Sheridan JJ; McDowell DA Food Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 32(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 22986197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacterial populations on dressed pig carcasses. Morgan IR; Krautil FL; Craven JA Epidemiol Infect; 1987 Feb; 98(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3549337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain. Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Moen B; Røtterud OJ; Dommersnes S; Nesteng O; Østensvik Ø; Alvseike O Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():70-76. PubMed ID: 26248068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and practicability of bacteriological monitoring of beef carcass contamination and their rating within a hygiene quality control programme of abattoirs. Untermann F; Stephan R; Dura U; Hofer M; Heimann P Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 34(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 9029256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle feces and contamination of carcass and various contact surfaces in abattoir and butcher shops of Hawassa, Ethiopia. Atnafie B; Paulos D; Abera M; Tefera G; Hailu D; Kasaye S; Amenu K BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28122502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of peroxyacetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite or lactic acid solutions on the microflora of chilled beef carcasses. Gill CO; Badoni M Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Feb; 91(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 14967559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs. Lindblad M Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbiological evaluation of groups of beef carcasses: heifers and steers. Jericho KW; Bradley JA; Kozub GC Can J Vet Res; 1994 Jul; 58(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 7954120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations. Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring the microbial contamination of beef carcass tissue with a rapid chromogenic Limulus amoebocyte lysate endpoint assay. Siragusa GR; Kang DH; Cutter CN Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 Aug; 31(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 10972724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses. Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]