These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6363557)

  • 1. French-chalk filled chemically-activated acrylic resin tray material.
    Barua AK; Kharat DD
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1983 Jun; 55(6):224-5. PubMed ID: 6363557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct pressure provisionalization technique: a new open-tray technique for complete-arch rehabilitations.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Feb; 31(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 11203918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A custom impression tray made with the aid of an existing prosthesis: a clinical technique.
    Cain JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 11677532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of light-cured acrylic resin for custom trays by undergraduate dental students: a survey.
    Khan SB; Geerts GA
    SADJ; 2008 Mar; 63(2):086, 088-92. PubMed ID: 18561806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the dimensional stability, fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured acrylic resin custom tray material.
    Khan SB; Geerts G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 19645307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A three-visit, complete-denture technique utilizing visible light-cured resin for tray and base plate construction.
    Ling BC
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15119715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impression taking in a partially edentulous jaw with the aid of a separable individual tray of acrylic resin].
    Brunner T
    Quintessenz; 1970 Apr; 21(4):65-8. PubMed ID: 4913456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adhesion between copper-plated acrylic tray resin and a polysulfide rubber impression material.
    Shigeto N; Kawazoe Y; Hamada T; Yamada S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 379322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Technic for taking impressions for complete dentures using autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Rendón intraoral tray)].
    Cerezo A
    Rev Col Estomatol Guatem; 1969 Jul; (31):15-22. PubMed ID: 4902473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
    Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.