These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 636410)
1. The commitment process for psychiatric patients. Changing status in the Western States. Shore JH West J Med; 1978 Mar; 128(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 636410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changing trends in mental health legislation: anatomy of reforming a civil commitment law. Aviram U; Weyer RA J Health Polit Policy Law; 1996; 21(4):771-805. PubMed ID: 8892006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes. Bloom JD J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 15704628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis. Loue S Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Where involuntary commitment, civil liberties, and the right to mental health care collide: an overview of California's mental illness system. Karasch M Hastings Law J; 2003 Jan; 54(2):493-523. PubMed ID: 15287113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mentally ill and dangerous: civil commitment or internment? The Belgian judicial framework]. Smets H; Verelst R; Vandenberghe J Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 19434576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The empirical consequences and policy implications of broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment. Durham ML; La Fond JQ Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):395-446. PubMed ID: 11652469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Compulsory admission of the mentally ill. Goodman E Med J Aust; 1977 Jun; 1(26):964-5. PubMed ID: 887041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Critique of the American Psychiatric Association's guidelines for state legislation on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Schmidt WC N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):11-43. PubMed ID: 16100810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conservatorship of Roulet: civil commitment and due process in California. Klipstein DB; Weinroth DJ Hastings Constit Law Q; 1979; 6(4):1061-106. PubMed ID: 11658279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Civil commitment decisionmaking: a report on one decisionmaker's experience. Morris GH South Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 61(2):291-351. PubMed ID: 11659028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill. Sadoff RL Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of persons committed to Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board. Rogers JL; Bloom JD Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 7159766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychiatric and nonmedical decisions on commitment. Badger MJ; Shore JH Am J Psychiatry; 1980 Mar; 137(3):367-9. PubMed ID: 7356069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy. Brooks AD Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]