259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6367517)
1. Abdominal wound closure.
Carlson DC; Wornom IL; Aldrete JS
Ala J Med Sci; 1984 Jan; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 6367517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary abdominal wound closure with permanent, continuous running monofilament sutures.
Archie JP; Feldtman RW
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Nov; 153(5):721-2. PubMed ID: 7027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal wound dehiscence.
Hugh TB
Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 2183750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
Mathur SK
J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure.
Rappaport W; Allen R; Chvapil M; Benson D; Putnam C
Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 2221612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wound disruption.
Lacey CG; Morrow CP; Disaia PJ; Townsend DE
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 48(6):730. PubMed ID: 792759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevention of abdominal wound disruption utilizing the Smead-Jones closure technique.
Wallace D; Hernandez W; Schlaerth JB; Nalick RN; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 6994003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention mesh: an alternative to retention sutures.
Yüce K
Eur J Surg; 1994 Nov; 160(11):641-2. PubMed ID: 7858050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Burst abdomen.
Br Med J; 1972 Jul; 3(5817):4-5. PubMed ID: 4557034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. No more abdominal wound dehiscences.
Stokes TL; Old L
Va Med Mon (1918); 1969 Sep; 96(9):506-13 passim. PubMed ID: 4899832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review.
Wadström J; Gerdin B
Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Jan; 156(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 2181798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.
Dodson MK; Magann EF; Sullivan DL; Meeks GR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 8272296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stainless steel wire for closure of abdominal operative wounds.
Halevy A; Oland Y; Adam YG
Am Surg; 1978 Jun; 44(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 354449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Importance of mechanical factors in the development of abdomial wound dehiscence. Tensile strength of the human and animal fascia with regard to various suture-materials].
Tauber R; Seidel W
Zentralbl Chir; 1975; 100(19):1178-82. PubMed ID: 132828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A
Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Closing of median laparotomies: interrupted versus continuous sutures using slow absorption thread].
Meyer P
Helv Chir Acta; 1984 Jun; 51(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6381423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Elimination of disruption of abdominal incisions.
Lord JW; Pfeffer RB; Golomb FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1969 Oct; 129(4):758-60. PubMed ID: 4898093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Closure of the abdominal wall after major gastrointestinal operations.
Hermans J
Eur J Surg; 1996 Apr; 162(4):349. PubMed ID: 8739427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence.
Poole GV
Surgery; 1985 Jun; 97(6):631-40. PubMed ID: 3890240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wound healing in abdominal operations.
Bucknall TE
Surg Annu; 1985; 17():1-22. PubMed ID: 3883538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
