These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6368845)

  • 1. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades.
    Valen M
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 6368845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parametric finite element analysis study of the stresses in an endosseous implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 7881333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [2-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis of the alveolar bone in applying a screw-type implant to a 4-unit bridge].
    Zibiki R; Kamezawa H; Yokozuka S
    Shigaku; 1986 Oct; 74(4):891-907. PubMed ID: 3540767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Stress analysis of the alveolar bone in applying a T-shaped plate implant to a free-end bridge using a 2-dimensional photoelastic method].
    Endo T; Koresawa K; Yokozuka S
    Shigaku; 1986 Oct; 74(4):874-90. PubMed ID: 3540766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems.
    Baiamonte T; Abbate MF; Pizzarello F; Lozada J; James R
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 9151632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Photoelastic model studies on environmental stress of functionally loaded endosseous dental implants].
    Häfer M; Knöfler W
    Stomatol DDR; 1985 Aug; 35(8):461-7. PubMed ID: 3914108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Physiological and mechanical requirements for design of a new implant (the Bicortex implant)].
    Texier J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(21):1991-9. PubMed ID: 3527976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The problem of load in implant prosthesis with needle fixtures].
    Treves G; Mondani PL; Pecis A
    Odontostomatol Implantoprotesi; 1978 Dec; (5):15-21. PubMed ID: 382009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tissue integration of dental endosseous implants: description and comparative analysis of the fibro-osseous integration and osseous integration systems.
    Weiss CM
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):169-214. PubMed ID: 3519994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theory of endosteal-subperiosteal implants.
    Yamane T
    Implantologist; 1977 Mar; 1(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 369987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Porous surfaced endosseous dental implants: fixation by bone ingrowth.
    Pilliar RM
    Univ Tor Dent J; 1988; 1(2):10-5. PubMed ID: 3053155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 6987233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation.
    Horiuchi M; Ichikawa T; Kanitani HWigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8699525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.