These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Review of oral rehabilitation with the Linkow blade implant in private practice over a 6-year period]. Wesche A Quintessenz; 1981 Feb; 32(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 7043553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Considerations for three dimensional implants. Mahler MS N Y J Dent; 1983 Dec; 53(8):377-8. PubMed ID: 6361634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative experiments on single tooth implants and blade implants of A12O3 ceramic]. Ehrl PA Osterr Z Stomatol; 1983 Mar; 80(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 6350988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic studies of endosseous blade-vent implants of a human mandible: report of an autopsy case. Schneider P; Makek M; Feigel A; Ochsenbein H; Lutz F; Mühlemann HR J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 290836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictable use of the blade-vent implant. Misch CE J Mich Dent Assoc; 1981 Nov; 63(11):776-9. PubMed ID: 7040666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Success and survivability of endosteal blade implants managed in the practice of Dr. Linkow. Aceveco AI J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(3):488-91. PubMed ID: 3334677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An eight-year report and the rationale for the buttressed anchor--an innovation in blade design. James RA; Valantine KR J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 385900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dynamic adhesion loading of the IK-blade implant and examination of adhesion compression]. Tham R; Meyer H; Kanth L ZWR; 1983 Jul; 92(7):52-3. PubMed ID: 6586032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Deformation studies of an embalmed human mandible in the wet state and an implant blade under static loading]. Shimada J; Koh T; Yamamoto Y; Sumida H; Hasuike T; Niikura K; Yagiu Y Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1981; 10(3):413-21. PubMed ID: 6959671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant. Ismail YH; Pahountis LN; Fleming JF Int J Oral Implantol; 1987; 4(2):25-31. PubMed ID: 3269833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomical considerations when using endodontic endosseous pins and blade implants. Barker BC Implantologist; 1978 Aug; 1(3):87-101. PubMed ID: 290560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Overview of new studies of fibro-osseous integrated blade implants and osseointegrated screw implants (I)]. Weiss CM Quintessenz; 1988 Jul; 39(7):1157-66. PubMed ID: 3252328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Linkow-blade-vents in the office. Experience report of endosseous blade implants]. Myska W Orale Implantol; 1974 Nov; 1(2):53-92. PubMed ID: 4620856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The Synthodont implantation system (I)]. Müller K Quintessenz; 1983 Oct; 34(10):1895-902. PubMed ID: 6366862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An experimental study on the tissue compatibility of the titanium blade-vent implant coated with HAP-alumina in the semi-functional state. Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Suetsugu T; Tanaka J; Tsunosue U J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(3):387-401. PubMed ID: 2855647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]