162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6371426)
1. Sterilization of the mentally retarded. The rules change but the results remain the same.
Soskin RM
Med Law; 1983; 2(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 6371426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution.
Reilly PR
Q Rev Biol; 1987 Jun; 62(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 3299450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Rousso A
Med Law; 1984; 3(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 6541745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal power to sterilise incompetent women.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1989 Apr; 1(8642):854-5. PubMed ID: 2564947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of involuntary sterilization.
Letterie GS; Fox WF
Fertil Steril; 1990 Mar; 53(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 2407562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
Cepko R
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
Jaegers EM
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The issue of sterilization and the mentally retarded.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jul; 33(7):523-4. PubMed ID: 7106711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
Irvine AC
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative approaches to the nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Price DP
Med Law; 1990; 9(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 2122162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eugenics and compulsory sterilization laws: providing redress for victims of a shameful era in United States history.
Silver MG
George Washington Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 72(4):862-92. PubMed ID: 16211742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Buck v. Bell: "felt necessities" v. fundamental values?
Cynkar RJ
Columbia Law Rev; 1981 Nov; 81(7):1418-61. PubMed ID: 10298419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
Ross DH
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When terminating parental rights is not enough: a new look at compulsory sterilization.
Blum ET
Georgia Law Rev; 1994; 28(4):977-1017. PubMed ID: 11653343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retardation and sterilization.
Dickens BM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):295-318. PubMed ID: 7184876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
