These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification. Downes J; Andrew JH Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification. Kitch TT; Appelbaum PC J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Nov; 27(11):2509-13. PubMed ID: 2681252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Burlage RS; Ellner PD J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3894412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from vented blood-culture bottles. Martin WJ; Wilhelm PA; Bruckner D Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S59-61. PubMed ID: 6372038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current issues and problems in dealing with anaerobes in the clinical laboratory. Allen SD; Siders JA; Marler LM Clin Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 15(2):333-64. PubMed ID: 7671577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes. Murray PR; Weber CJ; Niles AC J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Schreckenberger PC; Celig DM; Janda WM J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 3343321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isolation of obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria from feline subcutaneous abscesses. Hoshuyama S; Kanoe M; Amimoto A J Vet Med Sci; 1996 Mar; 58(3):273-4. PubMed ID: 8777239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system. Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the ATB 32 A system for identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Looney WJ; Gallusser AJ; Modde HK J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1519-24. PubMed ID: 2199516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MALDI-TOF MS identification of anaerobic bacteria: assessment of pre-analytical variables and specimen preparation techniques. Hsu YM; Burnham CA Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Jun; 79(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 24666700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the AnIdent system for the identification of anaerobic bacteria. Stenson MJ; Lee DT; Rosenblatt JE; Contezac JM Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 May; 5(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3709098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of methods for isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Rosenblatt JE; Fallon A; Finegold SM Appl Microbiol; 1973 Jan; 25(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 4568893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extensive evaluation of fastidious anaerobic bacteria recovery from the Copan eSwab® transport system. Demuyser T; De Geyter D; Van Dorpe D; Vandoorslaer K; Wybo I J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():73-78. PubMed ID: 29146304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]