These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6372145)

  • 1. Cervical gap formation in class II composite resin restorations.
    Ehrnford L; Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 6372145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The initial gap around large composite restorations in vitro: the effect of etching enamel walls.
    Brännström M; Torstenson B; Nordenvall KJ
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63(5):681-4. PubMed ID: 6231320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cavity design on gap formation in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Douvitsas G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 2066881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations.
    Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 2966820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin.
    Tung FF; Hsieh WW; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 12004668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-year assessment of anterior resin restorations inserted with two acid-etch restorative procedures.
    Qvist V; Ström C; Thylstrup A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Aug; 93(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 3898343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class 2 composite restorations: prevention in vitro of contraction gaps.
    Jørgensen KD; Hisamitsu H
    J Dent Res; 1984 Feb; 63(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 6229556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of light-cured and auto-cured composite resin restorations.
    Richardson AS; Derkson GD
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1987 Sep; 53(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 3308029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical margin integrity of Class II resin composite restorations in laser- and bur-prepared cavities using three different adhesive systems.
    Oskoee PA; Kimyai S; Ebrahimi Chaharom ME; Rikhtegaran S; Pournaghi-Azar F
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 22313277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro caries related to marginal leakage around composite resin restorations.
    Eriksen HM; Pears G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Jan; 5(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 272439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.