These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6373486)
21. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam. Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Restorative dentistry: an update for practitioners, educators, examining boards. Christensen GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Aug; 126(8):1165-8. PubMed ID: 7560575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of etchant and cement age on the adhesion of resin composite to conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Brackett WW; Huget EF Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9063213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Anterior esthetic restorations with bonded veneers in composite resins: an original technic]. Brouillet JL; Faucher A; Koubi G; Badillo F Cah Prothese; 1986 Jun; 14(56):25-41. PubMed ID: 3533232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. 25 years of veneering: what have we learned? Larson TD Northwest Dent; 2003; 82(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 14509087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shear peel bond strength of compomers veneered to amalgam. Al-Jazairy YH J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 11319538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Advantages of new restorative materials in dental care for children. Feigal RJ J Mich Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 81(2):32-6, 38. PubMed ID: 10686934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Veneering technique for a Ti-6Al-7Nb framework used in a resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a highly filled indirect composite. Matsumura H; Yoneyama T; Shimoe S J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):636-9. PubMed ID: 12488858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam. Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Coury TL Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adhesive strength between fiber-reinforced composites and veneering composites and fracture load of combinations of these materials. Waki T; Nakamura T; Wakabayashi K; Mutobe Y; Yatani H Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15237887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Sidhu SK; Watson TF Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 7546477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry. Vaikuntam J ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An update on glass-ionomer cements. Tay WM Dent Update; 1995 Sep; 22(7):283-6. PubMed ID: 8948211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives? Tyas MJ Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bonding and debonding with a light-activated resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Fricker JP Aust Orthod J; 1996 Mar; 14(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 9063113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]