These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6374118)

  • 21. Impression materials and electrodeposits. Part II: Electrodeposits.
    Stackhouse JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Feb; 45(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 6937656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linear dimensional changes in addition curing silicone impression materials.
    Marcinak CF; Draughn RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Apr; 47(4):411-3. PubMed ID: 6951042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique.
    Johnson GH; Craig RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Feb; 55(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 3514856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of epoxy resin, dental stone, and silver plated dies for cast gold restorations.
    Luria MA; Dennison JB
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1981 Jan; 63(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 7021840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative study of dimensional changes of copper-plated dies from different silicone impression technics].
    Saito T; Sotowa P; Tristao GC
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1988; 2(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 3079116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Dimensional change and deformation on stone dies for full cast crowns. Differences according to impression methods using vinyl silicone impression materials].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe M; Tejima R; Takigawa T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Jun; 27(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 2700283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adhesion of restorations to impression materials.
    Millstein PL; Maya A; Segura JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7575963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials.
    Hassan AK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A technique for developing a master cast with previously made dies.
    Harrison L; Goldfogel M
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1994 May; 11(4):49-53. PubMed ID: 7997801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9051599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. A comparative study of impression techniques.
    Wiktorsson G; Feder D
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 6348989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Modified method of compressive impression of the dental pulp cavity obtained with Optosil and Xantopren paste].
    Kulikowski A; Piwarski A
    Protet Stomatol; 1979; 29(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 399028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.