These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6374118)

  • 41. Condensation silicones: do new materials really presents better dimensional stability?
    Fonte-Boa JC; Mota JM; Poletto LT; Carvalho MC; Cortés ME; Sinisterra RD; Leal SF
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2011; 24(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 22010408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
    Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB; Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 3522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
    Beggs RJ
    Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cytotoxicity of impression materials.
    Sydiskis RJ; Gerhardt DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 8463975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Evaluation of cervical discrepancy of gold crowns in stone dies from various impression materials].
    Mantovani AV; Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2135328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of molds: influence of disinfectant solutions and elastomeric impression materials.
    Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Siqueira RM; Grandi VH; Lopes MB; Gonini-Júnior A; Caixeta RV; de Carvalho RV; Sinhoreti MA
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2017 Apr; 30(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 28688181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. SILVER PLATING OF RUBBER IMPRESSION MATERIALS.
    PHILLIPS RW; SCHNELL RJ
    J Indiana State Dent Assoc; 1965 Jan; 44():20. PubMed ID: 14241101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
    Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative study of dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques using addition silicone impression material.
    Penaflor CF; Semacio RC; De Las Alas LT; Uy HG
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 49(4):37-49. PubMed ID: 10202524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Polyether, polysulfide and silicone rubber impression materials. 1: quality of silverplated dies.
    Vermilyea SG; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1975 Nov; 57(11):371-4. PubMed ID: 1073918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Measuring the accuracy of various elastomeric impression materials using a CNC coordinate measuring device (Part 1)].
    Wichmann M; Borchers L; Limmroth E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 2269183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Surface mechanical properties of stone, resin, and metal dies.
    Fan PL; Powers JM; Reid BC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1981 Sep; 103(3):408-11. PubMed ID: 7024385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.