These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6374735)

  • 1. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
    Chiaradia V; Pistello M; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Beduz R; Menin A; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of enterobacteriaceae identification systems. An analysis of College of American Pathologists Survey data.
    Marymont JH; Marymont JH; Gavan TL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Sep; 70(3 Suppl):539-47. PubMed ID: 360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test reproducibility of the API (20E), Enterotube, and Pathotec systems.
    Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP; Malnick H
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 Apr; 30(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 323296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6365981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A; Dore R; Raffaele L; Cappello P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the API 20E biochemical patterns of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
    Martinez-Urtaza J; Lozano-Leon A; Viña-Feas A; de Novoa J; Garcia-Martin O
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Feb; 255(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16436064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Staneck JL; Vincelette J; Lamothe F; Polk EA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Use of microsystems for the identification of Enterbacteria in the microbiological laboratory: comments on technics and identification procedures].
    Ottaviani F; Aliani A; Benetti L; Viero B
    Ann Sclavo; 1976; 18(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 800723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources.
    Collins MT; Swanson EC
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Jul; 42(7):1269-73. PubMed ID: 7023301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enterobacteriaceae identification compared by MORLOC (a new system) and API 20E.
    Branson D
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Aug; 42(8):267-76. PubMed ID: 961710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification.
    Leighton PM; Little JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar; 79(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 6338701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.