These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6374758)

  • 1. Digital subtraction angiography: fundamental noise characteristics.
    Balter S; Ergun D; Tscholl E; Buchmann F; Verhoeven L
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 6374758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depth determination on stereoscopic digital subtraction angiograms.
    Higashida Y; Hirata Y; Saito R; Doudanuki S; Bussaka H; Takahashi M
    Radiology; 1988 Aug; 168(2):560-2. PubMed ID: 3293114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques.
    Ovitt TW; Newell JD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3887480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a digital subtraction angiography unit.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; Rauschkolb EN
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):613-7. PubMed ID: 7048418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative digital subtraction angiography: two scanning techniques for correction of scattered radiation and veiling glare. Work in progress.
    Shaw CG; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 3898220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system.
    Arnold BA; Scheibe PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Chan HP; Giger ML; Duda EE
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):799-803. PubMed ID: 3890012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital subtraction angiography of the coronary arteries.
    Neeley JP; Vannier MW; Gutierrez FR; Spadaro JJ
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985; 25(1):23-60. PubMed ID: 3902366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A photodiode array x-ray imaging system for digital angiography.
    Cunningham IA; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 6377032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital x-ray imaging: the basics.
    DeBrusk DP
    Radiol Technol; 1983; 54(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 6344134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereoscopic technique in digital subtraction angiography.
    Takahashi M; Bussaka H; Miyawaki M; Higashida Y
    Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):546. PubMed ID: 3901115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Resolving power of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Measurements of opacification with different blood vessel calibers and constrictions in relation to contrast media concentration].
    Schultz E; Fischer P
    Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 6411550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography: overview of technical principles.
    Harrington DP; Boxt LM; Murray PD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 6751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise reduction methods for hybrid subtraction.
    Nishimura DG; Macovski A; Brody WR
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 6377031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital subtraction angiography postprocessing].
    Smith-Sivertsen C; Andersen PE; Rasmussen F; Lindequist S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1986 Aug; 148(33):2088-91. PubMed ID: 3529564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital tomosynthesis: technique for electronic reconstructive tomography.
    Maravilla KR; Murry RC; Horner S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 6349310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.
    Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital angiography: matched filtration versus mask-mode subtraction.
    Liu P; Kruger RA; Nelson JA; Miller FJ; Osborn AG; Wojtowycz M
    Radiology; 1985 Jan; 154(1):217-20. PubMed ID: 3880608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.