These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6375265)

  • 1. Digital subtraction angiography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with a renal tumor.
    Prager P; Hoevels J; Georgi M
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 6375265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction angiography to conventional aortography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Boxt LM; Murray PD; Perlmutt LM; Monteiro KM; Long SI; Denny DP; Levin DC; Harrington DP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1985; 8(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 3910250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the preoperative evaluation of renal masses.
    Ford KK; Braun SD; Miller GA; Newman GE; Dunnick NR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Aug; 145(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 3875233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital subtraction angiography for evaluating patients with renal carcinoma.
    Zabbo A; Novick AC; Risius B; Montie JE
    J Urol; 1985 Aug; 134(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 3894691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the renal-adrenal area. Methods of use and indications].
    Roversi R; Golfieri R; Rossi C; Ricci S; Gemelli G
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):740-7. PubMed ID: 3912854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
    Hori S; Narumi Y; Marukawa T; Tanaka T; Tokunaga K; Yoshioka H; Kuroda C; Ichikawa S; Ishibashi M; Takaha M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Aug; 31(8):1329-37. PubMed ID: 3909790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Choice of an angiographic method in investigation of renal carcinoma (author's transl)].
    Michel JR; Moreau JF; Chevrot A
    J Urol Nephrol (Paris); 1974; 80(7-8):605-19. PubMed ID: 4374560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Comparison with conventional aortography.
    Buonocore E; Meaney TF; Borkowski GP; Pavlicek W; Gallagher J
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 7012920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of kidney carcinomas].
    Starck E; Rauber K; Knöner M; Sauer J; Kollath J
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1985 Jun; 5(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 3893853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Image quality in intravenous digital subtraction angiography of renal vessels].
    Neufang KF; Zanella FE; Mödder U
    Rontgenblatter; 1984 Jul; 37(7):237-41. PubMed ID: 6379840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography: intravenous and intra-arterial techniques.
    Sumner DS; Porter DJ; Moore DJ; Winders RE
    J Vasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 2(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 3883015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of potential renal donors.
    Sussman SK; Weinerth JL; Braun SD; Saeed M; Illescas FF; Cohan RH; Newman GE; Perlmutt LM; Dunnick NR
    J Urol; 1987 Jul; 138(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 3298691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fibromuscular dysplasia of renal arteries: comparison of intravenous digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
    Illescas FF; Braun SD; Cohan RH; Sussman SK; Saeed M; Dunnick NR
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Sep; 39(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 2971048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value of digital subtraction angiography compared to conventional angiography in diagnosing hypernephroma].
    Osman Mahmalat M; Beyer HK; Kukulies R; Schmitt WG; Fischer C
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Jun; 6(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 3524965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Renal artery imaging: a prospective comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
    Kim D; Porter DH; Brown R; Crivello MS; Silva P; Leeming BW
    Angiology; 1991 May; 42(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 2035886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Intravenous digital subtraction angiography].
    Triller J; Fritschy P; Fuchs WA
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jan; 117(4):113-22. PubMed ID: 3547633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A single intravenous injection for total angiographic evaluation of retroperitoneal disease. Intravenous inferior vena cavography, abdominal aortography, and nephrotomography via the saphenous vein.
    Finby N; Kanick V
    Angiology; 1968 Jan; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 5639590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of superior vena cava and antecubital vein as DSA injection site.
    Popky GL; Saluk PH; Griska LB; Parker JA; Consigny PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):317-9. PubMed ID: 6377859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.
    Clark RA; Alexander ES
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6339438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries.
    Schreier DZ; Weaver FA; Frankhouse J; Papanicolaou G; Shore E; Yellin AE; Harvey F
    Arch Surg; 1996 May; 131(5):503-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 8624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.